Freestyle twin for a big guy - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-18-2013, 06:31 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Freestyle twin for a big guy

I just started snowboarding this season. I currently use Rossignol Circuit Amptek 165. I went out several times and I am fairly comfortable connecting turns although I occasionally revert to either toe side or hill side slide when I hit a tricky spot. For the most part, I feel like I am progressing quickly and more importantly I am having the time of my life. I am regularly footed and I have been experimenting with various stance setting making adjustments after each day on the slopes. I started with a narrow directional stance and I finally evolved into symmetrical stance (+15/-15) 21 inch which is coincidentally the reference stance for my board. As I am learning, I am more and more interested in riding switch which is possible on my current board (directional twin with 10cm setback) although it would be easier on a true twin. As I've been learning on the slopes and on youtube, I am really tempted to get into a little bit of freestyle, nothing crazy, some butters and a jump here and there. I guess this style is called "mountain freestyle" or something like that.
I have been thinking of getting another board to start using next season that would let me ride switch/freestyle more easily. I am a big guy (5'10" and 270lb) so I am going to need a big board. Shoe size is 10 so wide and mid-wide would not work. I am considering either GNU Carbon Credit 162 OR Never Summer Premier F1 170. What do you guys think would be a better choice for me? GNU is shorter and Never Summer is longer than my current board and both seem to be well-built. Anything else I should consider? Another questions related to my heavy weight is, would I be able to flex one of those boards (tail press?) without snapping them? How sturdy are they? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

------------------------------
GNU Carbon Credit 162/Burton Cartel
Rossignol Circuit Amptek 165/Flow NX-2AT
Burton Moto 10
Switch +15/-15/21"

Last edited by JPonHudson; 03-18-2013 at 06:43 PM.
JPonHudson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-18-2013, 06:56 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,742
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 6
Those two boards couldn't be further apart and still both be not what you need. The CC is Gnu's intermediate priced, no frills all-mountain board. It's not going to be enough board for you. The Premiere F1 is a big mountain board.

At 270 I probably wouldn't go shorter than that 162, although that's still on the long side for freestyle riding. As for NS, look at the Heritage or Heritage X (if you have big feet, like size 12+). I think that is available in a 162. From Gnu, check out possibly the Rider's Choice although that might be on the soft side given your weight. Or the Dirty Pillow which I think is a mid-wide and also available in 162.

Then again, at your size you may *need* a board designed more for big-mountain riding.

Sabatoa is a bit taller than you but pushing 260 this year, he was riding a NS Legacy, which is the wide version of their popular SL, in a 163 length. Seemed to work out just fine for him. With that in mind I'd lean towards that or the Heritage which will be a little burlier.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
>>
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by david_z; 03-18-2013 at 06:58 PM.
david_z is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-18-2013, 07:20 PM
Veteran Member
 
Sudden_Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ottawa, On
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
The Heritage would be a solid choice. I was bouncing between 235 -250 lbs last season with size 9.5 feet and rode a 160 Heritageas a freestyle/do it all board. A 160-162 would be sturdy enough for your size but still playful.
Sudden_Death is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-18-2013, 08:47 PM
Veteran Member
 
NWBoarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 2,056
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
+1 for the Heritage, but I'd also throw the Proto into the mix. The Proto was built for freestyle first, all mountain second, and the Heritage is all mountain first, freestyle second. Both are fun to ride though and you really can't go wrong with either one.

Oh yeah!? Well, my mom says I'm cool!
Quote:
It never gets old, if you're in it for the passion, and not the fashion
NWBoarder is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-18-2013, 09:08 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,493
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
62 Flow Quantum, 160 K2 Fastplant, 162 Mans Board, 161 Machete GT, same size range in the Bataleon Jam or Rome Mod Rocker.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-24-2013, 08:12 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudden_Death View Post
The Heritage would be a solid choice. I was bouncing between 235 -250 lbs last season with size 9.5 feet and rode a 160 Heritageas a freestyle/do it all board. A 160-162 would be sturdy enough for your size but still playful.
I think I'll go for Heritage. Is it a true twin though? I've read somewhere that that there is a set back. NS website does not state anything which seems weird. Isn't this an important piece of information?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

------------------------------
GNU Carbon Credit 162/Burton Cartel
Rossignol Circuit Amptek 165/Flow NX-2AT
Burton Moto 10
Switch +15/-15/21"
JPonHudson is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-24-2013, 08:23 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPonHudson View Post
I think I'll go for Heritage. Is it a true twin though? I've read somewhere that that there is a set back. NS website does not state anything which seems weird. Isn't this an important piece of information?
It is a directional twin with 0.5"/0.75" setback - not that it really matters.
hktrdr is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-24-2013, 09:14 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,493
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
It mkatters if he wants a true twin and if the sidecut is centered on the setback or if the flex is directional...

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-25-2013, 12:31 AM
Veteran Member
 
scotty100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPonHudson View Post
I think I'll go for Heritage. Is it a true twin though? I've read somewhere that that there is a set back. NS website does not state anything which seems weird. Isn't this an important piece of information?
If you liked the Rossi and its camrock profile be mindful that NS has the opposite with rocker between the bindings...might not be a big deal for you to switch but some people find rocker between the bindings less stable, more skittish etc. Maybe check out the Rossi one magtek?
scotty100 is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-25-2013, 02:37 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
It mkatters if he wants a true twin and if the sidecut is centered on the setback or if the flex is directional...
Oh, absolutely. But the OP "just started snowboarding this season" and is just "fairly comfortable connecting turns" and "occasionally revert[ing] to [...] side slid[ing]". Yes, he wants to ride switch more, but compared to his current stick there is not going to be much of a difference between a true twin and a directional one like an SL or Heritage - and the directional would probably mash better with the rest of his riding.
hktrdr is offline  
Reply

Tags
big guy, gnu, never summer

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome