2013 Rome Artifact Rocker reviews? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2013, 12:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkwest View Post
Seeing as u like your ray gun why not just stick with like a 154 parkstar? I use a 154 skate banana for my all mountain riding. A lot of people will argue that the banana is not all mountain, but I'm comfortable on steeps, trees, pow, and then shredding park laps on it so its just personal preference. I demo'ed a ride machete gt and a burton bullet earlier this year and both those sound right up your price range and style.
Because I am afraid it will be to stiff. But my size on a 154w should prob flex decent.
Tbh would a soft board like the artifact really be THAT scetchy around the mountain?
LTP1996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-19-2013, 01:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 504
Default

I might have some decent input here as I ride a K2 Parkstar (both 2011 and 1012 models) and my brother rides a Rome Artifact Rocker (2012 model). First off let me start by saying that the Artifact Rocker IS a complete noodle, it's seriously ridiculous. If you're only using it for jibs and jumps smaller than 20 feet and buttering around smaller hills, it will dominate for you. If you want a bit more well rounded board, look somewhere else. The K2 WWW Rocker is basically K2's Artifact Rocker. They are very close to the same board. Slight differences in technology, but you won't notice much difference. I love my k2 Parkstars (which is why I bought another one). It has a very comfortable flex for me (I'm on a 152 at 160 lbs). I feel like it can do everything the Artifact can do and more. It won't have that immediate "lift your foot and the board comes right up" that the Artifact has but it's still easy to press and butter. The Parkstar has noticeably better pop off jumps and is surprisingly stable at higher speeds (I probably don't go much over 30-40 mph tops, but it does just fine for that). The Parkstar is a surprisingly fast board probably because of the sintered base. I destroy my brothers Artifact and my friends Burton Dominant when it comes to speed, it isn't even funny. As far as durability goes, I can only speak from my/my bro's experiences. Both my boards got several minor nicks around the edges of the topsheet, but the bases are super clean (again because they're sintered). My bro's Artifact has split and delaminated the topsheet on both the nose and the tail and again a 3rd time after one was epoxied back down. The base has deeper/more noticeable scratches as well.

In short, I'd consider the Artifact Rocker as more of a street board that you use for a couple rails at a time that is able to be ridden on the mountain (more suitably a smaller local hill) as well. The Parkstar is a great all around park board that is a bit stiffer to allow you to manage all around the mountain while being soft for easy presses and butters. A lot of info here, hope it helps.
Rookie09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 07:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rookie09 View Post
I might have some decent input here as I ride a K2 Parkstar (both 2011 and 1012 models) and my brother rides a Rome Artifact Rocker (2012 model). First off let me start by saying that the Artifact Rocker IS a complete noodle, it's seriously ridiculous. If you're only using it for jibs and jumps smaller than 20 feet and buttering around smaller hills, it will dominate for you. If you want a bit more well rounded board, look somewhere else. The K2 WWW Rocker is basically K2's Artifact Rocker. They are very close to the same board. Slight differences in technology, but you won't notice much difference. I love my k2 Parkstars (which is why I bought another one). It has a very comfortable flex for me (I'm on a 152 at 160 lbs). I feel like it can do everything the Artifact can do and more. It won't have that immediate "lift your foot and the board comes right up" that the Artifact has but it's still easy to press and butter. The Parkstar has noticeably better pop off jumps and is surprisingly stable at higher speeds (I probably don't go much over 30-40 mph tops, but it does just fine for that). The Parkstar is a surprisingly fast board probably because of the sintered base. I destroy my brothers Artifact and my friends Burton Dominant when it comes to speed, it isn't even funny. As far as durability goes, I can only speak from my/my bro's experiences. Both my boards got several minor nicks around the edges of the topsheet, but the bases are super clean (again because they're sintered). My bro's Artifact has split and delaminated the topsheet on both the nose and the tail and again a 3rd time after one was epoxied back down. The base has deeper/more noticeable scratches as well.

In short, I'd consider the Artifact Rocker as more of a street board that you use for a couple rails at a time that is able to be ridden on the mountain (more suitably a smaller local hill) as well. The Parkstar is a great all around park board that is a bit stiffer to allow you to manage all around the mountain while being soft for easy presses and butters. A lot of info here, hope it helps.
Wow,great info! I am sold on the park star! I will probably get the 154 wide,152 seems kinda small for my size Lol. My local shop carries k2,so this summer I will be looking for deals! Right known I am broke....so that's why I have to wait Haha. Thanks again for all the info,it really helped.
LTP1996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 07:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
jdang307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,838
Default

Going back to the Rome Shank discussion it actually isn't that soft at all. A 145 was stiffer than an Evo for me. It's definitely mid flexing.

Had my eye on the Artifact board for a buttering board, but maybe I should rethink that.
jdang307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 07:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdang307 View Post
Going back to the Rome Shank discussion it actually isn't that soft at all. A 145 was stiffer than an Evo for me. It's definitely mid flexing.

Had my eye on the Artifact board for a buttering board, but maybe I should rethink that.
I would deff get the shank but it doesn't come in a wide

Anyone know what the flex is on the bonless? That looks like a wide version of the shank
LTP1996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 11:18 PM   #16 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdang307 View Post
Had my eye on the Artifact board for a buttering board, but maybe I should rethink that.
I'm not trying to knock the Artifact. It's a great board (one of the best) at what it's made for. I'm just letting you guys know that it is definitely a pure jib/street board, good for buttering as well. Just don't expect it to perform when hitting jumps 15-20+ feet, carving, and riding fast.
Rookie09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums