little reassurance on mid wide - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2013, 04:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 220
Question little reassurance on mid wide

Hey guys, first time thread for me, I recently bought a custom flying v 2013 158W. I'm 5"11, weigh about 85kg and intermediate level snowboarder. Brit living and riding south island of NZ, mt hutt, queenstown, wanaka and a few club fields.

I have size 10 US feet, measuring in at 27cm using the wall to bare foot longest toe measuring system I saw on this forum. The board width at the inserts on my 12, -12 angle I ride is 27.1 Now I know the board is a little bit small for my weight but I wanted something a little easier to throw around and play on around the mountain while my girlfriend is learning on the mellow slopes.

I went mid wide because my other board is a cambered 159 Jussi '09 which has the process shape and I believe is also mid wide though is a little thinner (2-3mm) when I put them together, but for whatever reason (maybe my old moto's are big) I still have a decent 3/4 inch overhang on that.

So what I'm asking is
1.Was this a good board to buy for what I want to do? Butters, 180's, 360's, bit of off piste powder etc (Please no Burton hate, I like the company and the boards have treated me better than others I have tried over the 6 years I have been riding).
2. Is the mid wide going to be an issue? should I get a 160 regular width instead for the above? or just use my jussi for carving and ice and 158 CFV for playing about in park and nice conditions?
3. If I get some new boots with the reduced footprint will that effect any of the above?

Sorry for the long first post, looking forward to your feedback.

Sam
AntipodeanSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-23-2013, 05:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 184
Default

My take:

1. Burton hybrid camber is good on good snow. Ice, frozen crud and chunder??? not so much. That board should excell at what you want to do provided conditions are good. At 188lb your 158cm is on the shorter side so you gain playfullness and nimbleness in park but sacrifice stability when charging off piste and float in pow.

2. 10us size boots dont normally require wide boards. 12us and above from what I understand.

3. Boot reduction tech is supposed to reduce overhang.

Hope that helps.
Fergatron2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 06:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 220
Default

Thanks a lot Fergatron,

I guess my main worries is will the width of the board have a really noticable effect on my carving on groomers and pow as an intermediate rider? Or is this more something an advanced rider looking for a great deal of speed or control would notice?

Same with the length I guess, I know due to the sidecut and the width it will have a lot less effective edge, again will this give me much less stability or speed edge to edge as a competent intermediate mainly running down greens, blue, blacks and some easy off piste powder or again is it something that only somebody looking for high performance as an advanced/expert rider might notice?

I just don't want to invest a great deal of money in something that is going to keep putting me on my arse all the time again and washing out at middle speeds, being completely unmanageable. Yet I hesitate going any bigger than my 159 Jussi as I find this quite big and hard to rotate etc. and main desire for this board is to have some fun on good condition days.
AntipodeanSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 10:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 220
Default

thanks snowolf, really appreciate the feedback, will give it a whirl when the snow arrives here next month and see how it goes
AntipodeanSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 06:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 220
Default

Just looked on the burton website and it describes the 158w as a wide board but the guy selling it described it as mid wide. waist width is only 25.8 and the side cut is the same as the regular 158 but has less effective edge, so is this wide or mid wide? Most of the other wide boards I have looked at have 26cm and over. If only there could be some kind of regulation on what is what between brands!!!
AntipodeanSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 08:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntipodeanSam View Post
Just looked on the burton website and it describes the 158w as a wide board but the guy selling it described it as mid wide. waist width is only 25.8 and the side cut is the same as the regular 158 but has less effective edge, so is this wide or mid wide? Most of the other wide boards I have looked at have 26cm and over. If only there could be some kind of regulation on what is what between brands!!!
It is all labels and semantics. Ultimately it boils down to what works and what does not - and that cannot be summarized in one word or measurement.
But very generally speaking, there is no way that you need a mid-wide (let alone a wide board) with your foot size. Only potential reason is if you do not care about edge-to-edge response and want something with more surface area for pow (say, because you are going shorter).
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 08:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Official SBF Blogger
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,391
Blog Entries: 5
Default

A 25.8 is not really "wide" it's just wider than most (my Blacklist is billed as a midwide at 260mm), I'd say that's pretty squarely a mid-wide, and you'll be fine on it..
david_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 11:58 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 220
Default

Cheers guys, thanks for all the input, I know it must get tiring answering so many questions about size on here, but I guess with there being no industry standard when it comes to this area, it really does vary between not only brands but even boards. I did my research and the general consensus was that with a 10 boot I could fit well onto a midwide if I wanted without really noticing much or any (at my intermediate level) loss in performance, then looked at some threads on here and got worried I'd be trying to manoeuvre an ironing board.

While I have some experienced ears, I was riding 18, 0 last season but want to switch to something a little more duck like 12, -12 to practice some more tricks and nail my switch down this season. I ride regular and have had four operations on my right (back) knee, is moving my stance outward going to put a lot more pressure on my back knee?
AntipodeanSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 331
Default

I'm a little confused with this "wide slow edge to edge" as I have four boards all with different width measurements and while it is true that my widest board is the slowest edge to edge my most flexible board is the fastest edge to edge and my smallest board being the 2nd widest board is about equal edge to edge with my uninc which is the thinnest board of the bunch.

161 Brigade 253mm
154w Operator 254mm
159 Uninc 250mm
164 Slay blade 256mm


Is there something else that dictates edge response than just width?
ItchEtrigR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
Official SBF Blogger
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,391
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ItchEtrigR View Post
I'm a little confused with this "wide slow edge to edge" as I have four boards all with different width measurements and while it is true that my widest board is the slowest edge to edge my most flexible board is the fastest edge to edge and my smallest board being the 2nd widest board is about equal edge to edge with my uninc which is the thinnest board of the bunch.

161 Brigade 253mm
154w Operator 254mm
159 Uninc 250mm
164 Slay blade 256mm


Is there something else that dictates edge response than just width?
Not really sure what's confusing, especially given your own experience seems to square with the what others have said. Regardless there will be variance between different boards due to other factors you're picking up on like torsional flex, sidecut, etc., but as a general rule it is safe to assume that any "wide" model snowboard will be slightly slower edge/edge, more sluggish, than its normal width counterpart.
david_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
board size, custom flying v, mid wide, wide

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums