Lib Tech T.Rice 157 / 161.5 for deep powder? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2013, 07:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willy View Post
The camber profile for Attack Banana / Banana Magic is a bit similar to my old skate banana; only go into the park to hit the jumps but will definitely take a closer look at Riders choice / TRS. Thanks for the recommendations.
Actually, they are really not that close, especially the Attack Banana (normally not one of my favorite boards, but for what you are describing it could be a pretty good match). The twin camber in the profile makes a huge difference.
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willy View Post
I have come across quite a few post where the t.rice 157 is able to handle fine even at 200~ lbs in general conditions but your bit regarding deep pow is really a piece of valuable info, thank you.
Keep in mind that Hokkaido pow is nothing like PNW pow. It is basically a different planet.
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2013, 11:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
Keep in mind that Hokkaido pow is nothing like PNW pow. It is basically a different planet.
Meaning we would need a longer board to replicate the same experience in PNW pow? assuming all thing being equal, same rider + same board, would a +2 cm suffice?
Willy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 04:39 AM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willy View Post
Meaning we would need a longer board to replicate the same experience in PNW pow? assuming all thing being equal, same rider + same board, would a +2 cm suffice?
Again, it cannot be reduced to one variable. If anything, shape (in combination with profile) is the most important factor - there is a reason that boards designed in Hokkaido for riding in Hokkaido look like this or this....
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 08:52 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: B-Lo, NY
Posts: 175
Default

So what is a good "tree" board? Like a TRS?
SinkHole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 11:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willy View Post
I used to have a skate banana 156 which was awesome in Niseko pow. On everything else, it was a bit sketchy. Made me realize that a stiffer board is more suitable for my style of riding, sold the banana and got the highlife.

Anyway, this might be a gross simplification but I was comparing in my mind how much of a powder bonus each side profile gives. According to my weight, a camber 161 should be a decent powder board ...
1. Full rocker = +5 cm (skate banana 156 = camber 161)
2. C-R-C = +3 cm (t.rice 157 = camber 160)
3. R-C-R = +2 cm (highlife 155 = camber 157)

I am guessing that the C-R-C profile is slightly better that the R-C-R profile in powder. Not sure about this though, would appreciate if anybody can enlighten me on this.

I did look at the Proto but I find it a bit too flexi. Is the heritage the stiff version of the Proto?
I agree with you...my 153 trice pro rides about the same as my old camber burton custom 156. Feels very simliar in length despite being smaller. Actually putting them side by side...they are almost the exact same length. Not sure how that makes sense but they are.
jbernste03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 12:03 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: B-Lo, NY
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbernste03 View Post
I agree with you...my 153 trice pro rides about the same as my old camber burton custom 156. Feels very simliar in length despite being smaller. Actually putting them side by side...they are almost the exact same length. Not sure how that makes sense but they are.
I think it has something to do with the blunted nose and tail because I noticed that as well.
SinkHole is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lib tech rice powder

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums