What do you know about GNU Lib Tech Boards - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 05:47 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What do you know about GNU Lib Tech Boards

Hey guys, I'm looking at getting a new board for the season maybe. I looked at some videos and I saw some LibTech boards and GNU. My friend said he sees them on some pro riders, but it's not too popular. I couldn't find much reviews on these boards. But what kind of stuff do you guys know about these two companies.
gamer539 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 06:59 AM
Veteran Member
 
T.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
lib tech, gnu and roxy (and maybe a few others) are all made by mervin here in the US. great boards all around. you cant go wrong with a lib or gnu. i rock a lib tech jamie lynn pro myself and there are a bunch of people around here with skate bananas

Passion Over Fashion
T.J. is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 07:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They have become very popular recently with their banana reverse camber and magne-traction. Being owned by Quiksilver they have a decent amount of money to pump into, well whatever they want really. I'm not sure why they don't make the DC boards though, seeing as Quik own DC but the board are made by Rossignol who they used to own, but whatever.

You can find more info about BTX + MTX, but you'll wanna demo a board as some people think the reverse camber is the best thing ever in snowboarding and some (like me) are not the biggest fans of it. So it's personal preference for sure.
Snowjoe is offline  
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 01:09 PM
highermindF-ect
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Mervin!!!!

Mervin boards are the baddest boards on the mountain!!!! This is all how you look at it. Baddest as in "Kick Ass", and you mean, great all mountain boards with cutting edge Graphics and Designs. New Tech that is changing the face of snowboarding A+. Lots of rider exposure=lots of $. Or, Baddest as in "Worst" Mervin Skate Bananas easily de-lam and banana/rocker camber is less of an all mountain board. Sometimes, hard to get used to unless experienced. Lots of rider exposure=lots of $.

I love Mervin boards, myself. Especially the SB. But, since most of Mervin's 09 line comes equipped with BTX(Banana Tech), I plan to ride Lib Tech's TRS BTX. I rode GNU's Altered Genetics last year and loved it. The 09 AG has BTX. If you do go with Mervin, just be prepared for possible de-lam. Of course, that all depends on your style of riding.

Mervin's former sister company Rossignol has a few nice boards that feature MTX, if your interested in that technology. And, my experience with Rossi boards has always been good, in fact I ride my Rossi and Dynastar boards every year, depending on condition.

In any case, hope you find your ripper!
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 05:10 PM
dReWiZ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
What is the banana tech is it for more advanced riders only? and what is reverse camber?


would you reccomend a btx board to a intermediate rider...riding all mountain? Also i hear that you ride theseboards at shorter lengths why is this?

sorry for all the questions just trying to figure out if a btx would be good for me!


Thanks!!!!!
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 05:16 PM
Veteran Member
 
RidePowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My GNU CHB was a solid board, but the Danny Kass (not vertigo) wasnt the best. I learned alot about board tech last year because of it. The bottom had 3 gouges to the core that were filled with P-tex, 4 spots around the edges. mostly around the corners I had to epoxy because of delam and a few nickers on 10 and 2 of the nose because the board didnt have an edge on nose or tail. otherwise it was a nice board.

BTX just means the board is shaped a little differently. Think of a Banana and that is the basic principle, I havent used one personally but I feel like I would enjoy the Bataleon design a little more.

Magnetraction is a system that incorporates 7 points of surface contact instead of two. supposed to be more stable, I wonder if its as fast, more contact = more friction in my mind

Last edited by RidePowder; 10-30-2008 at 05:20 PM.
RidePowder is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 06:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If there is more friction, then it should actually go faster.
Bagels is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagels View Post
If there is more friction, then it should actually go faster.
That makes no sense, friction slows you down, the whole idea of waxing your board is to reduce friction on the snow. It's a resisting force so more of it can't make you faster.

Regardless I think the amount of extra contact on the edge will make close to no difference.
Snowjoe is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 06:11 PM
Veteran Member
 
RidePowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
wax reduces friction but it doesnt eliminate it. so while it may be a minimal difference in friction I do feel that there will be reduced speed. but it might be more stable, Im not sure I dont have any experience with MTX or BTX so I couldnt tell ya
RidePowder is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old 10-30-2008, 06:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was under the impression that wax creates friction on the snow. The snow melts because of the friction. When the snow melts into water, the board glides on it. That is what my impression was. Is this not true? Set me straight.
Bagels is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome