Difference between Burton Sherlock 2012 and 2013 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-30-2013, 09:42 AM Thread Starter
mad
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: France
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Difference between Burton Sherlock 2012 and 2013

Hi there !

I can't find any details on the differences between the 2012 and 2013 models of the Burton Sherlock.
Anyone can help me ?

Thanks
mad is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-30-2013, 04:13 PM
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad View Post
Hi there !

I can't find any details on the differences between the 2012 and 2013 models of the Burton Sherlock.
Anyone can help me ?

Thanks
Hey there, they added squeezebox and thats it.
AntipodeanSam is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-30-2013, 04:26 PM Thread Starter
mad
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: France
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the answer. Does it change much?
I've a pretty good deal on a 2012 model, was wondering if I should go for it or not.
mad is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-30-2013, 04:38 PM
Veteran Member
 
ekb18c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nyc
Posts: 1,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
If you have a really good deal on it, then pull the trigger and get the 2012 version.

I'm not sure you will notice the difference. I have the custom with squeeze box tech and I can't tell the difference when compared to another board that doesn't have it.
ekb18c is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-30-2013, 06:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad View Post
Hi there !

I can't find any details on the differences between the 2012 and 2013 models of the Burton Sherlock.
Anyone can help me ?

Thanks
I was wondering the same thing when I picked up a 2012/13 Sherlock (second quality) for $199. Aside from the squeezebox tech, they apparently mellowed out the flying V shape a bit from 2011/12. Not sure what squeezebox was supposed to do but the flex is on the softer side of mid-stiff.

It's a great board when conditions are ideal. When it's not ideal or things get tracked out I grab my Gnu Riders Choice because it helps me plow through crud and ice and crap with more confidence.
Fergatron2000 is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-31-2013, 05:49 PM Thread Starter
mad
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: France
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the answers.

Do you think the squeezebox improves stability on groomer/ice ?

I've tried the 2012 model at a test event two years ago, I know that it's far from ideal on groomer/icy conditions, but I've tested a lot of boards and never found a board as playful in pow as this one. The pop was also amazing compared to the other decks I tried...
mad is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-31-2013, 06:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad View Post
Thanks for the answers.

Do you think the squeezebox improves stability on groomer/ice ?

I've tried the 2012 model at a test event two years ago, I know that it's far from ideal on groomer/icy conditions, but I've tested a lot of boards and never found a board as playful in pow as this one. The pop was also amazing compared to the other decks I tried...
I never rode the earlier versions so I for one couldn't tell ya. I will say that I was expecting terrible edge hold (especially coming from a Gnu with MtX), but was pleasantly suprised by the Sherlock.

To be honest I haven't ridden it in "icey conditions", nor would I on purpose. FWIW I got the Sherlock as my resort/pow board assuming that it would be great under great conditions which it is. Don't expect it to be a super stable charger on hard pack and crud or give you great edge hold on ice.
Fergatron2000 is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old 05-31-2013, 09:15 PM
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad View Post
Thanks for the answers.

Do you think the squeezebox improves stability on groomer/ice ?
I'm gonna be honest I have ridden a few of Burton's flying V boards in hard/icy conditions and I think it is a small weakness that has been blown out of all proportion by all the Burton haters.

I'm not saying they are great in said conditions, just that over the last few seasons Burton have improved the shape and the hold, mellowing the rocker a little and adding the frostbite edges, and it rides about the same as many other boards of similar shape.

Unless you are real advanced looking for a bomber board and riding regularly in poor conditions (if so you shouldn't be looking at this style of board anyway) then this is a great board that excels in powder.

Just my opinion
AntipodeanSam is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-03-2013, 08:36 PM
Banned
 
Sick-Pow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,314
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The new sherlock ( last two years) is awesome. Amazing edge control wtth the mellow mag spots under your feet.

Plus the super aggressive park sidecut rules anything except taper IMO.
Sick-Pow is offline  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-04-2013, 10:17 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick-Pow View Post
The new sherlock ( last two years) is awesome. Amazing edge control wtth the mellow mag spots under your feet.

Plus the super aggressive park sidecut rules anything except taper IMO.
sounds like I should demo the new version. I have the first year version and it's a great board in soft snow but it doesn't like icy crap, so I have a cambered board for that.

It could be that the newer ones might be able to sustain one board quiver.
Lamps is offline  
Reply

Tags
burton, sherlock

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome