![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am looking at the Burton AK Jackets and Pants, and just wondering what everyones take on Gortex. Alot of people say it is a waste of money, considering most company's gear is already waterproof to a certain degree.
In whistler in can get very damp here, but I would not suggest I ride in the rain What's your take on it |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I went with the Burton Gore-tex RAW Denims for this season, but i got them for more than 50% off the retail price. Goretex prides it self on being the most waterproof membrane out their, and it is, but it is questionable if it is even necissary...so i'll give u the facts and u decide.
Goretex has a 30-36 thousand mL waterproof stat on its side BUT... To be considered waterproof on the market you only need 2 thousand mL waterproof capabilities That being said I wouldnt go with something with only 2000 mL .... Id say anything from 10 - 15 thousand mL waterproof is enough which are also the most common capabilities for any membrane other than goretex |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you are overlooking another great feature to gore-tex. its BREATHEABILITY !! it will keep you warm and dry during the storms, and when you are riding hard, it lets your sweat escape so you stay warm and dry. try riding in a plastic bag, and tell me how comfortable you are once you are covered in sweat.
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
anybody that says Gore-tex is a waste of money, you definitely have never used that material. I would never buy any winter clothing without it. Sure you pay a premium, for its licensing but the difference between that Stormtec stuff and Gore-tex is the ability to sleep in the snow without getting wet. I do that quite often waiting for friends and stuff, it's been years since I've had wet bottom, while my friends all complain about their Burton, 686, clothing. ha.
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The "company" I work for gives us gore-tex jackets and pants to wear for winter/rain. I've gone through my fair share of gore-tex and I also own high end Burton, 686, and Volcom gear. Gore-tex is far superior to any other material in terms of weather protection. Trust me on this one, I've tested my gore-tex in some of the harshest conditions in the world, due to whom it is that I work for.
It's worth the money. Last edited by Twix; 11-11-2008 at 03:45 AM. |
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 687
|
waste of money.......gore tex is all name there is plenty of other membranes that do the same thing as goretex.......... maybe 5-10 yrs ago it was worth it but now there are a million things identical to it without the name GORETEX on it .....save some $$$
__________________
"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 9,178
|
In a climate like what you find in the Rocky Mountain region (Colorado, Utah, Wyoming etc...) Gore-tex is not something that is needed as much. The drier snowfalls and all, I can get away with very minimal waterproofing on most of my gear and it's fine. In a climate like Whistler, Gore-tex is a great idea. Or another similar fabric such as Event, which might save you a few bucks, but the costs are probably going to be close to the same. You want some sort of water proof fabric that uses a "membrane" for repellancy and not a treatment (dwr). Over a long season the dwr will wear out and you'll get soaked. That stuff works fine for the visiting rider, but I wouldn't want it if I was a local.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|