Disadvantages of a board being too small... - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 03:20 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Don't listen to that guy if he had his way companies would still make stiff directional cambered boards with 10 feet of set back. Once again this forum is making people over analyze everything.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 03:59 AM
TLN
Senior Member
 
TLN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
My vote goes to longer sticks. Get as long as you can handle and give it a try. It's so much fun. With 175lbs you can easily ride a 168 sticks.
Wide won't give you stablity, but will definaly give you more float. You can chose between longer(and stable) board and wider (easy turning) board with same amount of float.

I cannot get an idea how a 240+ lbs guys ride 157-162 sticks in pow. This is either not pow, either they lie a bit
TLN is offline  
post #23 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 05:45 AM
The Swiss Miss
 
neni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Swiss Alps
Posts: 5,090
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 558 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLN View Post
I cannot get an idea how a 240+ lbs guys ride 157-162 sticks in pow. This is either not pow, either they lie a bit
Pow seems to be different over there or the riding style is different (less carving oriented?) or or it's just a traditional thing . All my male friens with around 190lbs ride boards around 160-164 for groomers n pow.


I really thought quicksand was going to be a much bigger issue in my life when I was little
neni is offline  
post #24 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 06:05 AM
Veteran Member
 
cjcameron11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argo View Post
Where your gonna be riding?

I'm 280-290 lbs and rode a 162w in up to nipple deep pow.... No problem here..... I did buy a pow specific board for deeper days here this coming season though just to see the difference. I now have a pin tail 163. My 162 is a directional twin with a 1" setback though.
Do you find you sink at all riding that 162? im a little lighter than you 275, and i ride a 165 berzerker but haven't been in deep stuff on it yet, ive been seriously considering buying a 178 prior for Japan, and when i go to Canada, i just assumed that the 65 would be too short.

Actually i am going to buy the longer board, but just curious how you ride a shorter deck in the deep stuff.

my names's Petey and i have gigantic balls
cjcameron11 is offline  
post #25 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 07:48 AM
Veteran Member
 
BoardWalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 883
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjcameron11 View Post
just curious how you ride a shorter deck in the deep stuff.
Charge that shit!
BoardWalk is offline  
post #26 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 09:16 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Quote:
For those curious as to what boards I'm considering, I've looked at a 162W GNU's Rider's Choice for all mountain riding, and possibly a 169 Burton Barracuda for strictly powder. (Both are a ~5 flex)
You are a great fit for both or those decks (perfectly centered in the weight range for each and a good match for foot size at a variety of stance angles and stance width options).

You can read a lot of opinions and reviews here on the Carbon Credit. We sell them so I will stay out of that but on the spec side it is definitely a fit.

Have you ridden S rocker? AWESOME in pow. My personal favorite profile for a pow only stick. The Barracuda would be a great choice for you for that portion of your riding.

STOKED!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #27 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 10:55 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
theMayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Denver, Co
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Have you ridden S rocker? AWESOME in pow. My personal favorite profile for a pow only stick. The Barracuda would be a great choice for you for that portion of your riding.
I have not. In the south-east, pow-specific boards are a waste of money. Even if we would get "dumped on" we'd be lucky to see 4in and it was guaranteed to be slush within hours of opening.
theMayor is offline  
post #28 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 11:06 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by theMayor View Post
I have not. In the south-east, pow-specific boards are a waste of money. Even if we would get "dumped on" we'd be lucky to see 4in and it was guaranteed to be slush within hours of opening.
Hi Mayor,

I had read your comment where you had written, "and possibly a 169 Burton Barracuda for strictly powder". I thought that was something you had been considering. If not, I would not suggest that board for the conditions that you are describing.

Thanks for the clarification.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #29 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 11:17 AM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,477
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by theMayor View Post
So you're suggesting to go bigger than suggested? I'm thinking that because I'm getting a WIDE board, that should give me the stability of a slightly longer board, correct? And for the GNU Rider's Choice, their website suggests purchasing (that particular board) 3cm shorter than "normal"... So I was looking at the 162W. Thoughts?
I would suggest getting a board in the right range.

Here's a calc I use to get a pretty decent starting point with picking a size: Snowboard Sizing Guide, Size Calculator

Using that calc with your stats, it suggests a 162 for you. I'd say that's a good number, but once you get used to rocky mountain powder you may want to increase the length a little.

Like Wiredsport said though "stability" has more to do with effective edge than board length. Look for boards with longer effective edge. Some manufacturers publish it and some don't.

Typical effective edge for a 160 cm board would be around 125 cm or so. More than that is better.
poutanen is offline  
post #30 of 65 (permalink) Old 07-31-2013, 11:20 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
theMayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Denver, Co
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Hi Mayor,

I had read your comment where you had written, "and possibly a 169 Burton Barracuda for strictly powder". I thought that was something you had been considering. If not, I would not suggest that board for the conditions that you are describing.

Thanks for the clarification.
Maybe you didn't read the whole post, I AM considering the Barracuda as I have just moved to CO last week and plan to ride as often as possible.

The previous comment was in response to your question about riding an "s-rocker" board... which I had not due to the fact I lived in TN.
theMayor is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome