Translating Board Size - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-23-2013, 05:44 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Translating Board Size

If I were to buy a board that is supposed to be sized down
And rode it at my actual size, how would that translate?
What are the pros and cons of that?

i.e. My size is 157, buying a board that says I should get a 152 but i go with longer size, 5'10" - 165/170 LBS - Int/Adv rider

My intuition tells me that I will have all the board has to offer plus more stability at high speed and forgiveness in landing. Like the extra length will ride out in tricky situations and an extra weight/'length would be negligible

Not sure though, let me know what you think?
thelin1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-23-2013, 09:18 AM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
The main difference is likely stiffness. I've seen the "sized down" boards and they do not have significantly more effective edge than their regular counterparts. So my guess is they're shorter, wider and stiffer.

I'd probably stick to a regular board if you want to keep it regular length... I never got the whole short board thing unless you're using it for park stuff.
poutanen is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-23-2013, 10:00 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
effective edge will give you a good idea how long a board rides. other than a few exceptions most of the size down marketing is fluff, partially steming from lib/gnu not making btx boards over 158 or so their first season and partially from new shapes allowing for longer effective edges
bseracka is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-23-2013, 11:58 AM
Veteran Member
 
Casual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
The main difference is likely stiffness. I've seen the "sized down" boards and they do not have significantly more effective edge than their regular counterparts. So my guess is they're shorter, wider and stiffer.

I'd probably stick to a regular board if you want to keep it regular length... I never got the whole short board thing unless you're using it for park stuff.
Some just have a blunted nose and shave off like 4cm so the 154 has the exact same eff edge as the 158. Pros are less weight in the tips for spinning and easier to handle in the park... cons? Not really sure but I've heard the effective edge really does feel the same as the 158 with no compromise. NS Proto HD is an example.
Casual is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-23-2013, 02:03 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,351
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelin1 View Post
i.e. My size is 157, buying a board that says I should get a 152 but i go with longer size, 5'10" - 165/170 LBS - Int/Adv rider

Hi Thelin,

This is a great question and we hear it every day. The most important thing in what you wrote is "my size is 157". That is where the big mistakes are made No rider has a size. The size that you will want is entirely specific to the model that you are considering, and how it was designed. The tip to tip cm size of a board will vary greatly depending on the model that you are looking at. This brings us to the all important question...what model(s) are you considering?

Stoked!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-25-2013, 02:49 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Hi Thelin,

This is a great question and we hear it every day. The most important thing in what you wrote is "my size is 157". That is where the big mistakes are made No rider has a size. The size that you will want is entirely specific to the model that you are considering, and how it was designed. The tip to tip cm size of a board will vary greatly depending on the model that you are looking at. This brings us to the all important question...what model(s) are you considering?

Stoked!
Thanks for the advice Wiredsport, I totally agree. I was considering a bunch of boards but just a moment ago, I picked up a 2012 K2 WWW 157 for $170, free ship. Didn't see the difference between the 2013 or the 2014, Thought it'll do the same thing, as long as boards don't get old sitting in plastic? I'm 5'10", 165LBS, all muscle and have a aggressive surfy carvy buttery style, likes rails, boxes, pressing, I want to progress this season on this more, as well as riding switch, I have a tendency to leave the park in search of natural rollers and features and always, always searching for waves all over the mountain to hack at, if it looks like a wave, I'm probably going to surf it, my two modes are easy flowing connections or hard charging aggro monster. They had a 142, 148W 152W and a 157. Pretty easy decision, though the 152W might have worked minus, not sure if I could have transitioned edge to edge as quick as I wanted on a wide and thought it may feel too loose and toy like with my prescribed riding style. I'll post pics when it arrives. Still have enough money to buy a 2nd more All-Mountain Freestyle, basically a stiffer deck to pair up with a 2 board quiver, what would you suggest? Thanks again
thelin1 is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-25-2013, 03:10 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,351
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelin1 View Post
Thanks for the advice Wiredsport, I totally agree. I was considering a bunch of boards but just a moment ago, I picked up a 2012 K2 WWW 157 for $170, free ship. Didn't see the difference between the 2013 or the 2014, Thought it'll do the same thing, as long as boards don't get old sitting in plastic? I'm 5'10", 165LBS, all muscle and have a aggressive surfy carvy buttery style, likes rails, boxes, pressing, I want to progress this season on this more, as well as riding switch, I have a tendency to leave the park in search of natural rollers and features and always, always searching for waves all over the mountain to hack at, if it looks like a wave, I'm probably going to surf it, my two modes are easy flowing connections or hard charging aggro monster. They had a 142, 148W 152W and a 157. Pretty easy decision, though the 152W might have worked minus, not sure if I could have transitioned edge to edge as quick as I wanted on a wide and thought it may feel too loose and toy like with my prescribed riding style. I'll post pics when it arrives. Still have enough money to buy a 2nd more All-Mountain Freestyle, basically a stiffer deck to pair up with a 2 board quiver, what would you suggest? Thanks again
The WWW is a fun board and should cover you well for Jibs and Press/Butter riding. You might want to check it out and see how it suits the rest of your riding. There are so many models that fit the all mountain remainder that you are describing. Please let me know if you were considering any specific models and I will be stoked to make some suggestions from your lead.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-25-2013, 04:03 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For the other board, narrowed down, still pretty open though
2012 NS SL (pref)
2013 Ride Buckwild
2013 Ride DH2
2013 Attack Banana or Banana Magic, more of a splurge for me, rather have the NS SL
thelin1 is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-25-2013, 06:13 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,351
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
What size is available in the NS?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old 10-26-2013, 02:05 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
151, 155, 158
thelin1 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome