![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#111 (permalink) | |||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
You're only Young Once,.. but you can be Immature FOREVER!!!! ![]() 2012/13 Season; (48) days out! |
|||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#112 (permalink) |
|
Drunk with power...er beer.
![]() |
No idea what I'm stepping into here, but to answer the actual question: the actuarial tables. There's more than enough statistical data to identify risky behaviours. In fact insurance companies use it all the time. That's why smokers get a lower rate (among many many other examples).
__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum Mountain Days: 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: so cal
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Im a bit confused...are we talking about health insurance or travel insurance or life insurance. I can't tell from your post? There's quite a bit of difference actuary tables for life insurance don't cover a lot of activities. And depending on who pays your premium (you or your employer) you may or may not need to disclose any information. which is funny, I know a few people who've gone on major cleanse diets and quit smoking and partying for the month prior to getting life insurance physicals. You know, so they;re test results would have better numbers...which is why the whole thing is just....bogus.
__________________
if a cat fucked a shark, the babies would be called women. snowklinger Last edited by mixie; 12-15-2012 at 01:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) | |
|
Drunk with power...er beer.
![]() |
Quote:
As for the cleansing thing -- that's just stupid. If you claim you don't smoke and you get a policy based on that, and if an autopsy (or whatever) shows you were a smoker then your policy is void and you've paid a lot of premiums for nothing. Might as well just not get a policy.
__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum Mountain Days: 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NW BC
Posts: 31
|
Wear a helmet, or don't, it's your choice. But if you smoke your noggin without one its too late at that point.
I've been boarding/ skiing for almost 30 years and only started wearing a helmet this year. I've only had 1 bad crash in all those years (landed on my hip in the park) but I starting wearing one for my kids. I want them to always wear a helmet so I wear one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 (permalink) | |
|
Drunk with power...er beer.
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum Mountain Days: 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Beech Grove, Indiana *sigh*
Posts: 4,168
|
I wear a helmet more out of concern from laceration from other boarders/skiers than concussions. Still, never a bad idea to protect the old bean.
__________________
Zombie Nation Gear: Rome Design 165 / Rome Arsenals Rome Anthem 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 117
|
Last year I started wearing a helmet and got some piece of shit from K2 for like 45 bucks, it sucked major cock and it was uncomfortable as hell..
This year I got myself a 2013 Burton Red Mutiny with speakers in it. It's light, keeps me warm and not bulky. You get what you pay for, and I'd pay a little extra to keep myself safe
__________________
Board: 2012 DC Devun Walsh Bindings: 2012 Rome 390 Boss Boots: 2012 ThirtyTwo Lashed |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|