Sugarbowl pass VS Kirkwood triple threat pass - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2011, 12:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 55
Default Sugarbowl pass VS Kirkwood triple threat pass

Debating which pass to go with. I haven't rode at either resorts enough to get a solid opinion of them and looking for some comments on both. Not really interested in debating $$ on the pass since both of them are relatively inexpensive compared to having to pay for saturdays at N*.

So what say you? What resort do you guys enjoy more?
greasem0nkey86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-23-2011, 02:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greasem0nkey86 View Post
Debating which pass to go with. I haven't rode at either resorts enough to get a solid opinion of them and looking for some comments on both. Not really interested in debating $$ on the pass since both of them are relatively inexpensive compared to having to pay for saturdays at N*.

So what say you? What resort do you guys enjoy more?
You do know that they sold out of the Kirkwood Triple Threat pass, right? Check this link. Personally I prefer Kirkwood's terrain to Sugarbowl, but Sugarbowl's park has historically been a lot better (I had a pass at Kirkwood for 7 years until 3 years ago when I moved to North Lake).
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2011, 06:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
surfinsnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonerider View Post
You do know that they sold out of the Kirkwood Triple Threat pass, right? Check this link. Personally I prefer Kirkwood's terrain to Sugarbowl, but Sugarbowl's park has historically been a lot better (I had a pass at Kirkwood for 7 years until 3 years ago when I moved to North Lake).
Selling out doesn't really matter. The promo ended two days ago. I don't care about park, but Sugar Bowl is a pretty damned fun mountain. It's no Kirkwood, but it's got similar terrain, just on a much smaller scale.
surfinsnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2011, 12:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 122
Default

Sugar Bowl is easier to get to drive-wise than Kirkwood, if that matters. Haven't been to Kirkwood (I'm a driving wimp) although plan to this season.

Sugar Bowl was our go-to mtn. last season. Judah Side of SB is fun and less crowded than the Mt. Lincoln side, good snow, good vibe, although on weekends, the whole mountain is overrun with ski-team/snowboard-team kids.

It would seem that either Sugar Bowl or Kirkwood > Northstar on a Saturday.
Kauila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2011, 01:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfinsnow View Post
I don't care about park, but Sugar Bowl is a pretty damned fun mountain. It's no Kirkwood, but it's got similar terrain, just on a much smaller scale.
The fact he mentioned Northstar leads me to guess that greasem0nkey86 is interested in park (there really isn't a reason to go to Northstar otherwise), but I could be wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kauila View Post
Sugar Bowl is easier to get to drive-wise than Kirkwood, if that matters. Haven't been to Kirkwood (I'm a driving wimp) although plan to this season.
Since you've never driven to Kirkwood, why are you giving opinions on the drive to Kirkwood?

The drive to Kirkwood is pretty good in my opinion (I prefer it). It is actually shorter by about 20 miles, but offset by the fact that the road gets narrow and windy the last 60 miles (speed limit drops down to 60). Driving time with no traffic is actually about the same as to Sugar Bowl (check it out on Google Maps).

However, the nice thing is that Kirkwood actually uses a different set of roads, which means that it doesn't get as congested as the roads leaving North and South lake meaning the actual driving time is often less. The final potential drawback to Kirkwood is that the drive requires you to take four highways (580E, 5N, 99N, 88E) - so requires a little bit of mental capacity to pay attention (that or a GPS), unlike the drive to North or South Lake Tahoe which is bloody stupid easy (get on 101N... drive 3 hours... done).
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums