Park City lawsuit - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 25 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 11:25 AM
Member
 
Khao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Gold Coast, Australia.
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpdsnowman View Post
I love big business..Heres the deal

"Talisker Land Holdings, LLC" actually owns the land the lifts are on. The agreement made back in the 70's obviously has outgrown itself.

They know park city makes a ton of money and talisker wants more in a form of higher rent..

so what do you do..you terminate the agreement and re-structure one

this will settle out of court. Park city will stay open talisker will get more money...it will all work out

its the same thing with indian land suits and casinos
Pretty much this. Lease termination dates are pretty straightforward. Don't know how they've managed to fuck it up so I imagine it's going to be quite one sided. I can see Talisker pulling out some legal loophole however (and there a thousands when it comes to land law unfortunately).

Representing down under.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Khao is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 25 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 11:39 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You guys have to realize the suit will likely settle out of court because the alternative means closing at worst acquisition by Talisker.

I think that the suit is a bargaining tactic to lower the rent because of venue concerns (where the case will be held)- beloved PCMR will be fighting a greedy Canadian real-estate conglomerate in Utah courts? PCMR seems to have an upper hand unless it's taken to a Federal Court and even then it's an American resort vs. a foreign company which means it'll still be an uphill battle for Talisker.

When you look at the implied assurances and manifestations of Talisker it's even more likely they'll be estopped from rejecting the renewing/extending of PCMR's lease.

In other words, don't worry... it will likely work out.

Last edited by 2813308004; 03-14-2012 at 11:44 AM.
2813308004 is offline  
post #13 of 25 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 11:43 AM
Member
 
Khao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Gold Coast, Australia.
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can't see the resort completely ignoring the end of their lease unless they have the most inefficient and lousiest legal team ever. It'd be my best guess that Talisker decided they wanted more money, Park City refused, so they've found some bullshit way to terminate the agreement. But who knowss

Cases like this rarely go to court. Both parties will protect their interests and negotiate. In a few months time, you'd have never known there was a disagreement.

Representing down under.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Khao is offline  
post #14 of 25 (permalink) Old 03-15-2012, 02:00 PM
Veteran Member
 
killclimbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 11,206
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Seems that the Ski link and Talisker screwing PCMR over is all part of Talisker's plan to reap profits off of raping the Wasatch. Well interconnected.

Andrew McClean did a tour of the proposed route for the Ski link Gondola, Cable care, whatever it's going to be.



His write up here. SkiLink’s Footprint StraightChuter.com – Backcountry Skiing & Beyond

The snowboarding forum thread we have discussing ski link. http://www.snowboardingforum.com/bac...k-article.html

I kind of get the attractiveness of being able to go to whatever resort in the Salt Lake metro from one location. The reality is, how much terrain do you really think you'll be able to ride in a day? Not very much of it. It's a gimmick, and what it will do is raise pass and lift ticket costs in the long run. Don't kid yourself, that is what will happen.
killclimbz is offline  
post #15 of 25 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 09:05 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
You also ride Dual Snowboards which means you suffer from a mental deficiency.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
post #16 of 25 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 09:23 PM
Veteran Member
 
jdang307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowolf View Post
Sometimes I hate our pseudo democracy. I most certainly did not vote to do so, but my vote does not count against a sea of greed and idiocy. We also happen to have the most corrupt, corporatist Supreme Court in the history of the Republic.
Still think so after Obamacare was upheld? I know you wrote this back in March.

By the way, Supreme Court did not rule corporations are people. They ruled corporations have 1st amendment rights. Huge difference. Corporations cannot vote or donate to campaigns. Two things "people" can do. OH snap, this is not the PoFo, so I'll get back on topic.

Quote:
In the early 2000′s United Park repeatedly and categorically told the Utah State Tax Commission that PCMR’s Leases would not expire until 2051 and that PCMR had the right to occupy the property until then. Based on these statements, the Tax Commission reduced the assessed value of the property by more than two-thirds. Having enjoyed the benefit of reduced property taxes resulting from these representations, UPCM and Talisker shouldn’t be allowed to change their position now.
I know the lawsuit will hinge on more than this one fact, but if true, this is one point PCMR can argue for estoppel. Detrimental reliance.

I plan to visit Canyons and PCMR this coming year. Don't think it'll affect those plans in anyway though.
jdang307 is offline  
post #17 of 25 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 09:26 PM
Veteran Member
 
jdang307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
What are dual snowboards? Is that a brand?

EDIT: Oh hell the fuck no. Just saw the video. Da fuck?
jdang307 is offline  
post #18 of 25 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 09:35 PM
Senior Member
 
aubzobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh boy. Damn corporate bullshit. Stuff like this just makes me mad.
aubzobot is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome