Review: Lib Tech T. Rice 161.5 - Page 4 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2014, 08:52 AM   #31 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
SnowDogWax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Slip Fusion, PA
Posts: 776
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Awsome choice LibTech best base….
SnowDogWax is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-06-2014, 04:08 AM   #32 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Thumbs up

I just ordered a 161.5 T Rice Pro. I was wondering if I ordered the right size...
I am ~180-185 pounds... 6'1"... 11-11.5 boots.

I have ridden 159s my entire snowboarding life (GNU Carbon Credit 159 Wide , Never Summer Heritage 159W)... I normally get a wide board because I assume I need it for my bigger than normal feel... thoughts?

did I order the right size... I figured the 157 would be too small.

Cheers!
spacemanspiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2014, 06:53 AM   #33 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
hardasacatshead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Aussie living in London
Posts: 649
Default

I think you're perfectly fine. The 157 would probably give you a little more manoeuvrability but the 161.5 will give you more stability when bombing and a little more float in the pow.

I know they're very different boards but I'm about the same size as you (10.5 boots though) and I ride a 157 Proto HD most of the time and it's on the verge of being too small for me (I think you'd be in the same boat with the 157 TRice). Heaps of fun all over the hill but I'd enjoy a little more board for deeper snow. On the groomers it's fine because it's got almost the same effective edge as your 161.5 Lib so holds an edge well enough for me.

So yep, you've made a good choice. Enjoy shredding the fuck outta that thing.
hardasacatshead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2014, 08:34 AM   #34 (permalink)
Fire on Ice...and Powder!
 
GreyDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Not nearly high or steep enough
Posts: 805
Default

Totally agree with hardasacatshead.

I'm 175-180 lbs., 5'11", but size 8.5/9 boot.
I owned both the 161.5 and 157.
157 is more maneuverable for my weight while 161.5 was more stable, a little better for charging.

Ultimately I got rid of both because of my smaller boot size, but I really liked the boards!
GreyDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2014, 08:39 AM   #35 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Default

thanks guys.... stoked!
spacemanspiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums