Review: 2012 Never Summer Proto CT - Page 25 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2011, 06:47 AM   #241 (permalink)
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Default

He said he's doing 50/50 park vs freeride. I'd honestly say he should be on the 159 Proto. A big reason why I am now a fan of true twins is because I feel more centered when I am doing things like butters and jibbing. It's not just spinning off kickers, but even spinning flat is easier on a true twin. Presses and all that good stuff is just more fun on a true twin to me. Switch riding is also easier on a true twin.

For pure freeriding, I'd go directional all day long. 50/50 park and freeride is the Proto's domain in my opinion.
__________________
www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-05-2011, 09:50 AM   #242 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
He said he's doing 50/50 park vs freeride. I'd honestly say he should be on the 159 Proto. A big reason why I am now a fan of true twins is because I feel more centered when I am doing things like butters and jibbing. It's not just spinning off kickers, but even spinning flat is easier on a true twin. Presses and all that good stuff is just more fun on a true twin to me. Switch riding is also easier on a true twin.

For pure freeriding, I'd go directional all day long. 50/50 park and freeride is the Proto's domain in my opinion.
Everything you just listed was jibbing related and mvandevegte said he wasn't doing jibbing. Let's realize I'm only comparing the 2012 SL (which itself is a near-twin) to the 2012 Proto CT (which is a true twin). I don't think that riding switch on the SL is noticeably harder than on the Proto CT (if it is... you need to just practice riding switch more ). Overall, I just happen to personally feel that the benefits of true twins are over-emphasized

50/50 Parks used to be SL territory in my mind (with the Premier being the full freeride board)... but now that I think about it more I think you are right in that Proto CT should now take over that role and I do think mvandevegte will love the board if he gets one.
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 10:41 AM   #243 (permalink)
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Default

Ah, I missed the part about him not jibbing. Well, off kickers too I like the Proto more than my other boards. The pop on it is just too good haha. That's really the only reason why though. The extra pop is nice for kickers or rollers or hips or gaps or hadoukens.

Yea, I hear the SL is only slightly setback. I'm thinking differences more in terms of comparing to a directional with normal setback.

BTW: I learned switch on my true directional '07 Shaun White.
__________________
www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 01:48 PM   #244 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default

So I'm positive this will be my next board when its available for purchase in NorCal. Was hoping for a suggestion on size though. I am 6', 180lbs with size 12 boots. I'm sure I'll need the wide (CTX?) but I heard because of the longer effective edge that I should downsize to a 155 instead of my usual 158. I usually do 50/50 park and freeride.
dresum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 01:54 PM   #245 (permalink)
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Default

155 CTX sounds like a great size for you. It will ride more like a 156/157.
__________________
www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 03:23 PM   #246 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default

155 CTX it is, thanks for the help Leo.
dresum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 04:20 PM   #247 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
Ah, I missed the part about him not jibbing. Well, off kickers too I like the Proto more than my other boards. The pop on it is just too good haha. That's really the only reason why though. The extra pop is nice for kickers or rollers or hips or gaps or hadoukens.

Yea, I hear the SL is only slightly setback. I'm thinking differences more in terms of comparing to a directional with normal setback.

BTW: I learned switch on my true directional '07 Shaun White.
I definitely agree I really like the pop on the Proto CT compared to the SL. As for true twin versus directional/setback... it again comes back to your riding percentages... I'm guess he is actually riding switch about 5% of total riding time or less (basically landing switch or taking off switch) in that case I don't know if a true twin is really important (nice to have but not necessary).

Coincidentally, today was "Switch Day" and we rode switch the entire day - carving down steeps, switch 50-50s onto boxes (no boardslides as it is a lot harder to stay straight the whole time), off of small kickers (20-25 ft). What really did me in was switch backside spins and surprisingly enough switch method airs... you should try it... so long as you don't mind looking like a novice all over again
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 04:23 PM   #248 (permalink)
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonerider View Post
I definitely agree I really like the pop on the Proto CT compared to the SL. As for true twin versus directional/setback... it again comes back to your riding percentages... I'm guess he is actually riding switch about 5% of total riding time or less (basically landing switch or taking off switch) in that case I don't know if a true twin is really important (nice to have but not necessary).

Coincidentally, today was "Switch Day" and we rode switch the entire day - carving down steeps, switch 50-50s onto boxes (no boardslides as it is a lot harder to stay straight the whole time), off of small kickers (20-25 ft). What really did me in was switch backside spins and surprisingly enough switch method airs... you should try it... so long as you don't mind looking like a novice all over again
Haha, I can ride switch, but not that good

I'm good with my normal methods lol.
__________________
www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 08:02 PM   #249 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 43
Default

how is this thing going to hold up in powder? I only like riding a centered stance and will avoid setting back my ride at almost any cost (probably to my demise). I am after a 'one quiver' board that can handle west coast resorts. I'm also not really sure how much size factors into riding powder. I rode a 160 k2 turbo dream with a centred stance on a (atleast) 3 foot powder day at squaw recently and didn't have a problem, even when i got to the flatter parts (though i did have to lean back a whole bunch). Two days later with just as much or even more snow (tahoe got seriously pounded end of feb and march) I tried a 155 jones all mountain twin. I was expecting great things but I suffered quite a bit. If i kept my weight towards the back constantly i was okay but any weight shift and the thing seriously nose dived. Again I was riding a centred. I' a tall skinny guy (5'11, 150 pounds) and am unsure whether height or weight play more of a factor.

Anyway this board looks seriously appealing. I loved the true twin playfulness of the evo and its ability to hold an edge, and the stiffness of the sl. It was the first RC board i had tried (only ever ridden a 157 burton un inc.). However I didn't get to try it in deepish powder (only some chopped up left overs). Anyways if I was to get the proto what size would be good for me? I mostly lap park when there is no snow or nice leftovers, but I don't want to compromise too much on my ability to ride powder.
masoupistoocold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2011, 09:30 AM   #250 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by masoupistoocold View Post
how is this thing going to hold up in powder? I only like riding a centered stance and will avoid setting back my ride at almost any cost (probably to my demise). I am after a 'one quiver' board that can handle west coast resorts. I'm also not really sure how much size factors into riding powder. I rode a 160 k2 turbo dream with a centred stance on a (atleast) 3 foot powder day at squaw recently and didn't have a problem, even when i got to the flatter parts (though i did have to lean back a whole bunch). Two days later with just as much or even more snow (tahoe got seriously pounded end of feb and march) I tried a 155 jones all mountain twin. I was expecting great things but I suffered quite a bit. If i kept my weight towards the back constantly i was okay but any weight shift and the thing seriously nose dived. Again I was riding a centred. I' a tall skinny guy (5'11, 150 pounds) and am unsure whether height or weight play more of a factor.

Anyway this board looks seriously appealing. I loved the true twin playfulness of the evo and its ability to hold an edge, and the stiffness of the sl. It was the first RC board i had tried (only ever ridden a 157 burton un inc.). However I didn't get to try it in deepish powder (only some chopped up left overs). Anyways if I was to get the proto what size would be good for me? I mostly lap park when there is no snow or nice leftovers, but I don't want to compromise too much on my ability to ride powder.
It's a centered reverse rocker in the middle, how do you think it would do in powder... duh, float. If you can't get it too than your doing it wrong.
The Intern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums