![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#311 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 121
|
I just posted up my full review of the proto ct on my blog The Snerds. You can check it out here NEVER SUMMER Proto CT 2012 Geeks of Shred!. I hope its helpful!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#312 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,058
|
The Angry Snowboarder Blog Archive 2012 Never Summer Proto CT Used and Reviewed everyones been waiting for this one I guess
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#314 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,723
|
Great reviews, keep it up. The information is invaluable. I'm coming of a 10/11 NS Evo 151 (I just unloaded my entire quiver onto craigslist after finding this deck). However, I was eyeing a NS SL 153 but I couldn't live with the directional flex ... I want a true twin.
This just might be it ... 152 or 154 Proto CT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#317 (permalink) |
|
Official SBF Blogger
|
@Oskar I think I mentioned it above but I go about 210 lbs and I rode the 57 without any trouble. If I were buying one I would probably go with the 160, but I've also got 30 pounds on you. You should be OK on the 157.
__________________
Repping the world's smallest mountains...
aGNARchy: no rules, just gnar! |
|
|
|
|
|
#320 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 325
|
I range from 195 to 205 pounds and the 157 works great. I really like the board. Not saying I wouldn't ride the 160, but I have many other boards in that size. Right now in my quiver I ride a 157, 159, 161, 164, 168. That is why I got the 157 Proto, wanted to go a bit smaller and I have not been disappointed.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|