![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#832 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 39
|
I'm pretty sure the only difference between the 2012 and 2013 board is the graphics. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. I know there will be a change for the 2014 proto. They're adding tech to reduce some chatter at speed I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#833 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
![]() what chatter? I've had the '12 and '13 now and never had an issue. I must just be used to riding a pipe board everywhere
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#834 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6
|
which would you guys recommend PROTO 154 or 155 or CTX 155?
im about 5'9 157-160lbs ish, size 11 boot, semi intermediate, i do all park and about a trip to mammoth once a year. i currently have mission bindings re:flex restricted want to pair it up with this board but not sure what size |
|
|
|
|
|
#835 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,200
|
Quote:
Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#837 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minneapolis / Switzerland
Posts: 171
|
Just going to throw this in here for other people's reference...I'm 5'9 180lbs and ride a 157. I'm more of an all mountain freestyle rider so you may want to go shorter if you're mainly aiming for park
|
|
|
|
|
|
#839 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,200
|
Quote:
26.1 is simply much too wide for a size 9 boot. You shouldn't go over 25.5 cm waist. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|