![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#152 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
You're gonna love the Proto, especially if you wait and get the HD. As for an all mountain NS stick, the Heritage is where I would go. I've never ridden a Raptor, but the Heritage is plenty stiff, as well as damp, and great at groomer slaying and crud busting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
I had a friend who pretty much exclusively uses jib boards and he went and tried my Raptor a few days ago. Until he tried this board, he couldn't see what the big deal about carving was. Needless to say he was addicted after a few runs and is looking to maybe getting one next year. All he went on about was how the board just "bites" and "rails" through a turn like you were putting afterburners on. All NS boards carve to some degree or another, but this particular one (Raptor), just takes it to another level. I've only rode the SL previously for a few years, but I can definitely tell the difference in carving ability is HUGE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 8
|
Just pulled the trigger on the 2013 Raptor 164...
I've been riding a 165 T5 for the past 7 years, on a 163 premier for 7 years before that... I was really vascilating between waiting on the 2014 with the increased dampness, or if I should go for a Cobra, since I live for powder in the trees... I went with the Raptor because I wanted something that would handle the big mountain stuff and crud when I needed it... Also torn between a 164 or the 161x. I'm a size 12 shoe, but ride in 11/11.5 boots. At 5'11" and 170, I guess I'm a little light for a 164, but I've been riding longer boards all my life. Anyone have any word on this Raptor vs. Cobra choice? 164 vs. 161x or even a 159? and 2014 vs 2013.... Mainly hoping that I made the right choice cause I'll be on this board for the next 7 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#158 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wasatch Mtns, Utah
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
I think both your weight and boot size is much better suited for a 161X. You will get a little better maneuverability in the trees that you like from the shorter board and will float better in the powder due to less toe/heel drag. My feet are on the border of getting a wide board with a size 11 shoe and 10.5 boot but with you being an 11.5-12, definitely go with the 161X. Last edited by scottyroo; 04-03-2013 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I love trees as well and the 161X is a dream. At your weight, the 164 might be a bit large if you need super agility but I'm sure you can handle it given your experience with boards at that length. The Raptor really isn't all that stiff, all things considered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 8
|
Thanks for the quick replies...
Now, I'm a bit torn based on the advice towards the 161x... The waist width the 164 is about 0.5 cm less than my T5, and the 161x is about 0.5 cm more. I do ride with an agressive stance at +27 & +12 degrees, so maybe that would help make the narrow board better... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|