REVIEW; Neversummer Raptor 156 - Page 19 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #181 of 211 (permalink) Old 04-08-2013, 07:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the feedback on the length question...

Sounds like up to 1 cm of overhang is ok, but no overhang would be bad...

I'll take some measurements...
markiel is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #182 of 211 (permalink) Old 04-09-2013, 12:09 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So I have a 164 at home, just checked the overhang in bare feet...

Front foot at 0 or so, back foot at about 1.6 cm or so...

So I don't know, do I switch for the wide board to cut teh back foot to 0.6, but the front foot isn't wide enough?

The 164 definitely looks skinnier than my previous board.

I guess with the premier, I wouldn't have to think through this issue because they have only one size which is perfectly wide for my foot size.

Is the 161w going to turn better given the shorter length and tighter side cut?
markiel is offline  
post #183 of 211 (permalink) Old 04-10-2013, 09:14 AM
Senior Member
 
wernersl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by markiel View Post
So I have a 164 at home, just checked the overhang in bare feet...

Front foot at 0 or so, back foot at about 1.6 cm or so...

So I don't know, do I switch for the wide board to cut teh back foot to 0.6, but the front foot isn't wide enough?

The 164 definitely looks skinnier than my previous board.

I guess with the premier, I wouldn't have to think through this issue because they have only one size which is perfectly wide for my foot size.

Is the 161w going to turn better given the shorter length and tighter side cut?
I can only speak from my experience. I weigh about 260 and ride a 165W. I wear size 11 boots. There are times I wish I bought a normal width. Thats only when riding slowly with new riders. Its a bitch to turn at low speed. Once Im freeriding, I have no problems banging turns with it. I havent barefooted my board, so I cant help you there.
wernersl is offline  
post #184 of 211 (permalink) Old 04-10-2013, 12:17 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the feedback Werner SL...

Still thinking on this, but with a 164 sitting in my livingroom, I might just keep it and give it a go.

One thing that I'm wondering about is bindings. Are the new style reflex bindings lower profile (board to boot) than my 2008 vintage burton Cartels?
markiel is offline  
post #185 of 211 (permalink) Old 04-10-2013, 01:24 PM
Junior Member
 
scottyroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wasatch Mtns, Utah
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by markiel View Post
Thanks for the feedback Werner SL...

Still thinking on this, but with a 164 sitting in my livingroom, I might just keep it and give it a go.

One thing that I'm wondering about is bindings. Are the new style reflex bindings lower profile (board to boot) than my 2008 vintage burton Cartels?
I think the profile is about the same. I had 2008 Burton Mission bindings and upgraded to 2013 Burton Cartels this year and the disc width is pretty much the same.

Regarding the 164 vs 161X... you are right on the fence with your angles. I would say if you hadn't already bought the board, go with a 161X, but since you already have a 164 you might as well give it a go. The 161X is still avaiable at Backcountry.com Never Summer Raptor X Snowboard - Wide | Backcountry.com - I would buy it at that price and give it a go. If you don't like it you return it in a month or 10 years from now and all you have to pay is $6.99 in shipping. If you are that torn, I would go that route.

I have a 164 and love it but keep in mind I'm 6'3" 195 with a 10.5 boot with an 18/0 degree directional regular stance. Fits me perfectly. Maybe you could play around with your stances with a 161X to give you more leverage and control at the edges since they are so agressive right now. Either decision you make won't be earth-shattering and detrimental to you ride. Both decisions have their pros/cons with your boot size/weight/stance angles.
scottyroo is offline  
post #186 of 211 (permalink) Old 09-20-2013, 11:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What Size to order 159, 164 or 161W

I am getting close to ordering a 2014 Raptor and seeking some advise on size.

Currently riding 2010/2011 Raptor 164 with Burton C60 Binding and 10.5 Burton Ion Boots

Rider Stats:
Height: 5'11"
Weight: 180-185 lbs
Boot size: 10.5
Sex: Male
Stance: Regular
Riding Level: Advanced Freeride
Preferred Terrain: carving groomed hills, steeps and powder
Experience: 10+ years average 30 days per season
Location: California, Lake Tahoe Area

Considering following there sizes: 159, 164 or 161W


Any recommendations would be appreciated.
CAfreerider is offline  
post #187 of 211 (permalink) Old 09-21-2013, 12:33 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAfreerider View Post
I am getting close to ordering a 2014 Raptor and seeking some advise on size.

Currently riding 2010/2011 Raptor 164 with Burton C60 Binding and 10.5 Burton Ion Boots

Rider Stats:
Height: 5'11"
Weight: 180-185 lbs
Boot size: 10.5
Sex: Male
Stance: Regular
Riding Level: Advanced Freeride
Preferred Terrain: carving groomed hills, steeps and powder
Experience: 10+ years average 30 days per season
Location: California, Lake Tahoe Area

Considering following there sizes: 159, 164 or 161W


Any recommendations would be appreciated.
159 best. You could go 164 if you really wanted to, but I do not see the benefit.
Definitely not the wide.

Last edited by hktrdr; 09-21-2013 at 12:35 AM.
hktrdr is offline  
post #188 of 211 (permalink) Old 09-21-2013, 03:08 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Clarkston, WA
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
159 best. You could go 164 if you really wanted to, but I do not see the benefit.
Definitely not the wide.
I tend to agree with this especially if you do any tight trees

danm
danm is offline  
post #189 of 211 (permalink) Old 09-23-2013, 05:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Will order 159cm

Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
159 best. You could go 164 if you really wanted to, but I do not see the benefit.
Definitely not the wide.
Thank you for your reply.
I will order 159 broad.
CAfreerider is offline  
post #190 of 211 (permalink) Old 09-23-2013, 10:39 PM
Senior Member
 
wernersl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
aint gonna lie...a bit envious of the 2014 model!
wernersl is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome