REVIEW; Neversummer Raptor 156 - Page 7 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2013, 02:31 PM   #61 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 19
Default Re: REVIEW; Neversummer Raptor 156

Check on evo.com, they have a size chart for each individual board. The 156 shows 125-175 lbs, while the 159 is 145-195. seems like you may find the 159 a better fit?
alcko is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-22-2013, 02:49 PM   #62 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
wernersl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcko View Post
Check on evo.com, they have a size chart for each individual board. The 156 shows 125-175 lbs, while the 159 is 145-195. seems like you may find the 159 a better fit?
I'd say 156.
wernersl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 03:29 PM   #63 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
JDMITRB18CR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRONGOOSE View Post
i want to buy the 2013 or 2014 Raptor but im 5'5 170 pounds size 9.5-10 boot and I'm not sure whether to buy a 156 or 159 :/
156
JDMITRB18CR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 03:40 PM   #64 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 19
Default Re: REVIEW; Neversummer Raptor 156

Nice. I'm 165 lbs and was almost considering the 159. Danm also said to go for the 156.

Any reason behind going 156 vs 159 for irongoose? The size chart shows him right in the middle of the range for 159, and really at the top of the range for 156. Is it just cause they "ride long"?
alcko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 03:50 PM   #65 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcko View Post
Nice. I'm 165 lbs and was almost considering the 159. Danm also said to go for the 156.

Any reason behind going 156 vs 159 for irongoose? The size chart shows him right in the middle of the range for 159, and really at the top of the range for 156. Is it just cause they "ride long"?
I was also just maybe thinking 159 so that i can grow into it a bit more since i am quite short and my current park board (never summer evo 2012) useto be at my eyebrows now its perfect at my chin but i also think it would be better to get the best for now rather then struggle. But, by looking at the charts on evo.com i am almost maximum for the 156 but in middle for the 159

Last edited by IRONGOOSE; 02-22-2013 at 03:52 PM.
IRONGOOSE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 03:56 PM   #66 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
scottyroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wasatch Mtns, Utah
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRONGOOSE View Post
I was also just maybe thinking 159 so that i can grow into it a bit more since i am quite short and my current park board (never summer evo 2012) useto be at my eyebrows now its perfect at my chin but i also think it would be better to get the best for now rather then struggle. But, by looking at the charts on evo.com i am almost maximum for the 156 but in middle for the 159
If you are still growing get the 159 for sure
scottyroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 03:57 PM   #67 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 155
Default

It seems people are still looking at height more than weight when choosing a size for a new deck. I weigh 170 and 180+ with riding gear, I could not imagine riding a 156 or smaller!! I usually ride 161+ and have 59 for my play board.

Go 159!
cc898 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 04:03 PM   #68 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
scottyroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wasatch Mtns, Utah
Posts: 29
Default

I blame myself for hijacking this thread with talk about snowboard sizing and width. Sorry. Back to the 2014 Raptor! SnoWolf - when do you think you'll have the review ready?
scottyroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 04:53 PM   #69 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Clarkston, WA
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyroo View Post
If you are still growing get the 159 for sure
Agree with this, it might ride you at first but you'll grow into it.
danm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 04:55 PM   #70 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Clarkston, WA
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyroo View Post
I blame myself for hijacking this thread with talk about snowboard sizing and width. Sorry. Back to the 2014 Raptor! SnoWolf - when do you think you'll have the review ready?
No guilt needed, just a nice ongoing conversation about a kick ass board! BTW, I think you should just go 165X, should be perfect for your feet.

danm
danm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums