|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|03-17-2014 02:53 PM|
The DL's are going to be a bit softer in the highback then the Rome Targas.... The baseplate is pretty stable and responsive because of the carbon infused material in the baseplate, but the highback is a bit softer because of those milled out sections in the highbacck. Hope this makes sense...
Let me know if you have any other quetisons!
|03-16-2014 10:14 AM|
Originally Posted by LadyFlinstone View Post
Do you guys think DL is more responsive and stiffer than Rome Targa? or about the same?
|03-10-2014 06:57 PM|
|LadyFlinstone||The DM's are Flux's most responsive binding... defiantly not too soft.|
|03-08-2014 11:06 PM|
Originally Posted by legends6spd View Post
|03-08-2014 10:22 PM|
|SnowDogWax||Raptor is a sweet looking board…|
|03-08-2014 10:18 PM|
|legends6spd||Is it possible to put DMCC light on the Raptor or is that binding too soft?|
|01-26-2014 12:27 AM|
Thanks guys-- ended up getting the Flux DMs and really like them so far. Super light and love the toe caps on them.
|01-08-2014 10:34 AM|
|Art_mtl||I have Flux DM on my 13/14 Raptor and they work pretty well together. Very responsive and it makes a pretty light combo.|
|01-08-2014 12:55 AM|
Appreciate the feedback guys.. I checked out the Union Chargers in the shop and really wasn't a fan of the ratchet system..
I've narrowed it down to Flux SF/DM or the Burton Diodes.. Other than cost, any main differences to be aware of?
Also, the 159 is a bit on the smaller side and is fine with my current setup, but definitely don't want to end up with a pair of boots/bindings that hang over the edge (Size 10.5-11 feet).
|01-08-2014 12:36 AM|
I had a Raptor and ran 2 bindings on it. The Flux DMCC (previous version of the DM) and SF. Both worked but the DM was the perfect match since such a responsive board deserves a super responsive binding. Loved the stealth fighter look of the combo too.
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|