Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Bindings for T Rice c2 Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-06-2010 07:46 PM
danm I have NXT FSE's on my T.Rice and that seems to be a good match, I tried my Bent Metal Step Ins last season and they worked but mostly for super hard charging freeride... My Step Ins will now permanantly reside on my Mullet!
12-05-2010 08:58 AM
Extremo Flux SF45's, Union Force SL
12-04-2010 09:32 PM
Nivek V-Rod baseplate... So no, not really.
12-04-2010 02:32 PM
frostypants Alright well it looks like Targas are the winner. Any reason to pony up the extra $50-$75 for 2011's if I can get a new pair of 09-10s? I.e., is there any difference between the two?
12-03-2010 08:10 PM
ev13wt Targas. Go for it. They feel good, look good and taste great. Errr, wait wrong thread.
12-03-2010 07:16 PM
Nivek Flux SF45's, Flow NXT-ATSE, Targa's.
12-03-2010 06:01 PM
Soawsome Ride SPi's
12-03-2010 05:04 PM
frostypants Thanks Leo, very helpful. I'm not a quiver guy (although I'm definitely keeping my forum 154 around for jibby days), so I'm thinking the Targas are probably a better match. I'll just keep my old bindings on the forum. They work.
12-03-2010 02:57 PM
Leo Ideally, flex-wise the Stiff high-back Targas are a better match for the stiff T.Rice than the softer high-back Bosses. However, I personally would slap the 390's on there more so for future swappability. Although the Targas have an adjustable flex ankle strap, the stiff high backs will pretty much leave it as an option for only stiffer boards.

Basically put, if you think that you are going to be using these bindings for multiple boards in the future, the mid-flex Bosses are the ideal choice. If you are going to keep these bindings attached to this board or other stiff boards, the Targas are a better match.

Both have the cant system and super comfy straps so you're all set in that department.

Although I always recommend matching the flex of the binding and boots to the board to people, I myself don't do that. It's just a personal preference of mine. I use mid to mid-stiff bindings on any type of board with mid-soft to mid flex boots. It's just what I find to be most comfortable for me.
12-03-2010 02:47 PM
frostypants Would the Targas really be better than 390 bosses?
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome