|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|10-10-2012 03:00 PM|
Do yourself a favor and avoid the Cinch's worst bindings I ever owned. At first I really liked them but as the season wore on they showed themselves to be real big turds. The lateral flex in them is terrible and I had issues keeping the guide cable in the clip on the high back because I rotated them etc. Just a big waste of time that really wasn't any faster to get in or out of.
I hear you on the flows and although I agree they've got the best of the rear-entry set-ups, if you're not into the way the feel it's a moot point.
I went from the Cinch's to the Ever's with the auto tech from K2. If you're looking for a traditional binding with a quicker in and out I suggest looking at this line because it really does give you the best of both worlds.
|10-10-2012 02:36 PM|
Originally Posted by geolemon View Post
|10-10-2012 10:49 AM|
Originally Posted by geolemon View Post
|10-10-2012 09:17 AM|
I found this deal online - thoughts on last year's DS30 compared to this year's RK30? Normally the DS30 is much more expensive.. that doesn't necessarily translate into "better" when it comes to a flexible freestyle binding, I know.
Flux Ds30 Bindings Black Gradient | Mountain Outhouse
|10-10-2012 09:12 AM|
The highbacks were another thing scaring me away from the GNU bindings - I'm picturing them clamped right against your leg, which isn't how I ride.
There are two local resorts here, neither has big vertical, and I have a season's pass to the one that's got the shorter runs. "Mountain" would be too strong a term to use.
Essentially it's all ridden like a park, even outside the park areas.... it's all groomed, never soft stuff, lots of jibbing and hitting things skate style.
I'm going to Colorado late January, but that's a few and far between thing. Last time I was at a resort of that scale, it was Vermont, somewhere around '98 or so.
I want to make sure that I've got something right for daily use in my area, and I'll make due in Colorado - I'll have to adjust everything for that trip regardless.
The Flux's are intriguing, the RK30's. And still defaulting back to the Burton Custom Restricted's. I found there's a shop near the 2nd resort that carries Flux's... it's a small resort town, maybe I'll take a date down there for a little B&B overnighter, and I'll check out the bindings while we're walking around checking out the shops.
|10-10-2012 04:25 AM|
Flux are great if you don't need canting and too much dampening. Super solid and light, great ratchets and straps.
The difference between the RK30 and the TT30 is that the RK30 highbacks are very soft. I found them very comfy but mainly suitable for jibbing and park. The TT30 highback has that typical all mountain flex. not too soft but still pretty flexy. Can't go wrong with them.
|10-09-2012 11:49 PM|
Checked them both out - quite a price difference between them, and besides the stabilizer pads and "light" designation, I'm not seeing much difference between them - possibly the DMCC had the more advanced ankle strap, but the regular strap on the TT30 doesn't seem like a compromise. What's the big upgrade on the DMCC vs. the TT30?
Also, Flux has an excellent website. From their product page, I'm wondering if the DS30's might better fit - more flexible, more of a skate feel. $250 is still up there in the price range, and makes me wonder similar to the above, what's the real differences between that and the SE30's, which is a midgrade binding with more flex (according to their very generalized mouse-over popup)? Half the cost, nearly.
Maybe I shouldn't say their website is excellent - trying to find the difference between the TT30 and RK30 is puzzling...
Both claim to use allllll the same parts... but are different bindings
Looks like the RK30 highback is urethane while the TT30 is nylon. I might like the more flexible back better, I rode back in the 90's cut-down era, I don't put much lean in my highbacks, I don't really rely on them.
|10-09-2012 10:12 PM|
From Flux you'll probably like TT30's or DMCC Lights.
Personally for 2013 I like the strap on the standard Cartels more than the asym.
And the Cinches actually have a less rigid baseplate. That lift arm is the reason.
|10-09-2012 10:00 PM|
I think based on the flex ratings on GNU's site, I'm second guessing either.
The K2's I worry about play in the binding, and seem like they have very rigid bases.
The GNU bindings seem the same - the Parks I was looking at have an aluminum base, and a stiffer rating. Strap comfort is important to me as well, which is an unknown.
I have been checking out Burton's 2013 line, and the bindings that seem best suited for this kind of riding seem to actually be the Custom Restricted (re:flex), over the missions - or the Cartels I used to own - and they actually cost a tiny bit less. The restricted's have the upgrade of the asymmetrical strap over the basic customs.
On that note - a buddy of mine who lives in California recommended Flux bindings - I don't believe anyone even sells them locally so that throws a wrench in the process a bit - but I'm interested if anyone has any comments about Flux bindings that would compare to a Burton Custom (good flex, comfortable, secure, with bulletproof rachet hardware)? He didn't mention a particular model, I may call him to find out.
|10-09-2012 02:30 AM|
I have 2012 Choice and I imagine they are quite similar to the 2013.
The tension relief does not do too much at all. Not really something I do as you kinda have to release it before you do anything - I am pretty lazy
Also I am finding with my left binding (I'm goofy) that the buckle is slowing down with its release significantly and I have about 15 days use on it.
The release of the bindings when you pull the high back down makes the smallest difference with any other rear entry binding.
This is all just my experience with it.
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|