Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Can't get C60's--what do I want? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-19-2013 12:52 AM
Chef Jer
Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
All mounted up and ready to test out tomorrow! First time I will have been riding a non-C60 binding in 3 years...

Very nice Only thing I disliked about my diodes was how snow would build up under my boot... by the end of a powder day I would have an ice canted footbed
01-19-2013 12:48 AM
poutanen All mounted up and ready to test out tomorrow! First time I will have been riding a non-C60 binding in 3 years...

01-18-2013 08:02 PM
ShredLife
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETM View Post
Failures in the resort are one thing but miles out in the BC are a nightmare, plastics are much more durable.
i'd never disagree with you on that - but it'd be nice if it was an option. maybe offer it as an add on like the Burner upgrade kit.

there is a market for it as evidenced by competing product lines. Karakorum run carbon highbacks and i haven't really read about any of those breaking. i have confidence that Spark would test them until they're proven before releasing them like they seem to be with the Edison. i think they learned from the lesson of the Blaze v1.0 straps...

edit: i should't have said 'the carbon highback' in the first post, i mean A carbon highback - maybe a stronger one for bc
01-18-2013 07:57 PM
ETM Im actually stoked the sparks dont have carbon highbacks. I wouldnt have bought them if they did. Failures in the resort are one thing but miles out in the BC are a nightmare, plastics are much more durable.
01-18-2013 07:50 PM
ShredLife diodes ride perfect. i'd maybe improve the durability and adherence of all foam padding on the highback and footbed. i'd use a slightly harder but tougher foam or rubber.

Burton Bindings - mad props for your partnership with Spark R&D. would love to see the carbon highbacks turn up there too if its possible with the metal heelcup - Karakoram offers CF on their higher-end joint.
01-18-2013 07:01 PM
ETM Ill give you some feeback on the diodes. They need a strengthening cross member at the top of the highback. As they are now the top of the highback is extremely vulnerable to being knocked and chips very easily, once chipped cracks start to propogate and you know the rest.
I love my diodes, but I constantly fear breaking the highbacks again. I even remove the highbacks during travel and take them with me in my carry on luggage cause one knock is all it takes and they break.
Also the stick on pads that act as a barrier between the highback and the heel cup, they dont last long.

I fucking love the way they ride, but they are fragile mofo's lol.
01-18-2013 03:46 PM
poutanen
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonBindings View Post
2: The C60, if you look at it's legacy, kept getting heavier since 1996 when we first introduced the X-Base. Functionally, it's just a really stiff binding but it kept putting on pounds for extra features to compensate for geometry or for the sake of having an extra feature. B3 gel, and this and that.
Man I wish I had seen this thread earlier! I for one love the C60s... However I just bought some diodes (non-EST) to try out against the 2009 C60s on my main freeride board.

Holding them in person I was actually impressed with the torsional stiffness of the highback. I thought they were going to be wet noodles compared to the C60 highback but not so. They feel about 90% as stiff as the C60 highback.

Also the toe caps remind me of my 2011 C60s, I actually swapped those onto the 2009s and vise versa. The 2009 heel strap and 2011 toe cap was a good combo. It looks like the Diode keeps the best of the two C60s before it. I'll be trying them out tomorrow so we'll see!
12-18-2012 05:21 PM
UNION INHOUSE
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonBindings View Post
Well a few things happened:

1: we kept hearing feedback from our customers that our old highbacks had too much forward lean built into them. remember we're an east coast company and snow is generally firmer here than other places. Also, we have a lot of pipe riders on our team that actually want forward lean. So forward lean makes sense, but not everyone needs it. The caliber of rider that wants it is usually knowledge able figure out how to add it.

2: The C60, if you look at it's legacy, kept getting heavier since 1996 when we first introduced the X-Base. Functionally, it's just a really stiff binding but it kept putting on pounds for extra features to compensate for geometry or for the sake of having an extra feature. B3 gel, and this and that.

so we said, fuck all that, it needs Jenny Craiged. So we argued what's important and we argued in grams. So yes it is simple, either by consolidating/integrating features into a single part or just eliminating them because this customer generally doesn't care about them feature.
I.E. Formula 1 cars doesn't have CD players in them.

Jenny Craiged. hahahahahaha
12-17-2012 04:06 PM
Lamps
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonBindings View Post
Well a few things happened:

1: we kept hearing feedback from our customers that our old highbacks had too much forward lean built into them. remember we're an east coast company and snow is generally firmer here than other places. Also, we have a lot of pipe riders on our team that actually want forward lean. So forward lean makes sense, but not everyone needs it. The caliber of rider that wants it is usually knowledge able figure out how to add it.

2: The C60, if you look at it's legacy, kept getting heavier since 1996 when we first introduced the X-Base. Functionally, it's just a really stiff binding but it kept putting on pounds for extra features to compensate for geometry or for the sake of having an extra feature. B3 gel, and this and that.

so we said, fuck all that, it needs Jenny Craiged. So we argued what's important and we argued in grams. So yes it is simple, either by consolidating/integrating features into a single part or just eliminating them because this customer generally doesn't care about them feature.
I.E. Formula 1 cars doesn't have CD players in them.

cool, thanks for the insight
12-17-2012 03:57 PM
BurtonBindings
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamps View Post
On that note when I look at the C60's vs the diodes it seems like there has been a major simplification/design change, e.g. fwd lean adjustment now integrated vs being a seperate set of parts on the highback. The base seems a lot simpler too. Is this a trend?
Well a few things happened:

1: we kept hearing feedback from our customers that our old highbacks had too much forward lean built into them. remember we're an east coast company and snow is generally firmer here than other places. Also, we have a lot of pipe riders on our team that actually want forward lean. So forward lean makes sense, but not everyone needs it. The caliber of rider that wants it is usually knowledge able figure out how to add it.

2: The C60, if you look at it's legacy, kept getting heavier since 1996 when we first introduced the X-Base. Functionally, it's just a really stiff binding but it kept putting on pounds for extra features to compensate for geometry or for the sake of having an extra feature. B3 gel, and this and that.

so we said, fuck all that, it needs Jenny Craiged. So we argued what's important and we argued in grams. So yes it is simple, either by consolidating/integrating features into a single part or just eliminating them because this customer generally doesn't care about them feature.
I.E. Formula 1 cars doesn't have CD players in them.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome