Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Going from EC2 to Camrock Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-15-2013 12:10 PM
skip11 I haven't tried C3 yet but I don't really like NS' version when I demoed the Evo. I rode the T.Rice for 2 seasons before I got the YES the other day.
01-15-2013 11:44 AM
Sick-Pow I think the Never SUmmer and Flying V and C3 are better versions of rocker and camber IMO.
01-15-2013 11:43 AM
Wiredsport Hi,

The sub-message of this thread is that the tech that is described in the literature is not always what shows up in the board...
01-15-2013 11:40 AM
skip11 bumpity bump
01-14-2013 06:27 PM
skip11 Yeah, but it's supposed to have a freeride camrock which you can see here Nidecker Snowboards - Technology Camber. The diagram is totally different that what you get. So I'm just wondering if it's supposed to be like the diagram or since they moved the production to Elan, the camrock changes a bit as well.
01-14-2013 06:23 PM
Wiredsport
Quote:
Originally Posted by skip11 View Post
I just got mine, it seems that mine has more camber and goes pass the inserts more? It's a 156, maybe it's my table, but if I lay it on the floor you can see the minor rocker up front. It rises up a bit more when you load the camber.

http://sphotos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphoto...58566474_n.jpg
That is what I had seen as well. Pretty much classic Rocker Camber Rocker (which is a very fun design).
01-14-2013 05:24 PM
skip11 @arsenalfan: could you post another pic of the camber profile (side view), from the front binding up to the nose?
01-14-2013 05:19 PM
skip11 Can anyone else confirm this?
01-14-2013 03:54 PM
skip11 I just got mine, it seems that mine has more camber and goes pass the inserts more? It's a 156, maybe it's my table, but if I lay it on the floor you can see the minor rocker up front. It rises up a bit more when you load the camber.

http://sphotos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphoto...58566474_n.jpg
01-06-2013 10:56 PM
NWBoarder I had a Signal Omni that had almost the same profile. The board was a blast to ride. The camber really lets you ride it anywhere and feel comfortable doing it. The rocker is nice for when you're just slow cruising and messing around. It really makes the board feel more "lively" at slow speeds since you can engage the rocker to make butters and presses a breeze. Have fun riding it man, I'm sure you'll love it!
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome