Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Arbor Element 165 vs. Ride Yukon 164 Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-30-2008 12:17 AM
legallyillegal SL-R 161 and 165 both have a waist width of 25.5 (fine for 11.5)
SL-R 158: 25.3
Legacy-R 161: 26.5
163: 26.9
166: 26.9
11-30-2008 12:11 AM
ElChupocabra no, you would want to look at the Legacy-R which is a wide SL
11-29-2008 05:14 PM
Arbor Element 165 vs. Ride Yukon 164

Interested in upgrading from my Burton Royale 158 this year. Been looking hard at the Arbor Element, Ride Yukon, and maybe even the Never Summer SL with the reverse camber.

Weight - 170
Boot - 11.5
Style - freeride

any suggestions?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome