Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Bindings help. k2, flow, burton Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-30-2014 07:55 PM
larrytbull The GNU Weird, is an interesting binding. It has the cant, and the eva footbeds. things I liked, but I was not a fan of the toe cap. I also had some issues getting them on on steeper areas, as the clip on the heelcup to close it gets in the way. I wound up going to flow.

The CTX is better beuilt and offers the side entry like the flow as well as rear entry, but the latch can be a bear to snap in or out
01-30-2014 07:50 PM
bseracka Gnu bindings are pretty much garbage: poor quality, poor materials, poorly designed and prone to breakage

Sent from Free App
01-30-2014 07:23 PM
easleyjr96 So I found a pair of GNU Weird bindings for around $80. They are normal $210 but I was wondering how these bindings sized up to maybe some of my other options such as the K2's that were mentioned above. Is GNU a respected brand and has anybody tried this particular model? I have read ggood things about them but the info I have found on them has been very limited and I would like to get further opinion. These bindings also feature the fold back system which I would highly prefer for the convenience. Thanks for any insight on these bindings.
01-30-2014 06:58 PM
sclogger K2 Formula's for $129 will be hard to beat.

2013 K2 Formula Black Large Mens Snowboard Binding | eBay
01-30-2014 05:52 PM
Bindings help. k2, flow, burton

Hey there. I have been snowboarding for about five years now and really enjoy it a ton. I decided to upgrade my gear this year, but am on a pretty tight budget. Before I had some generic board and bindings, but I made it work and had a lot of fun on it. I think just about anything is an upgrade from what I had before, and I am convinced I will enjoy just about anything that I get, but I want to maximize the time and enjoyment that I will get out of my next pair of bindings.

I bought a Burton Cruzer 164 and need some new bindings for it. I kind of like to do everything when I go out. I enjoy just riding down the hill and going fast as well as getting in the park. So I believe what I am looking for is a binding that isn't really good at a specific thing but rather something that is decent at all things and I should be able to ride with in most situations.

I would really appreciate having the convenience of the fold back bindings that flow and K2 makes in their cinch series, but I do not know about the reliability of bindings like this or if the cheaper range of bindings like this are reliable. I would rather lose this convenience and have bindings that are going to last me rather than have to buy a new pair of bindings at the end of the season because I broke them. Also, if I did go the traditional binding route rather than the fold back, I was looking at Burton bindings since I have a Burton board and it has the 3 hole pattern, but are there other binding companies that will fit this 3 hole pattern and are more reliable than Burton bindings?

My budget is around $100.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome