|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|02-23-2014 07:05 PM|
Originally Posted by holroyba View Post
|02-23-2014 10:08 AM|
Since profiles/pop have been mentioned, I should say the Launch Vice RC I demoed was not entirely full reverse camber (even though the board description says it is, in catalogue and elsewhere). It had a bit of camber under the insert packs, more like CRC. I'm not a fan of full reverse camber thus I wouldn't have demoed it. I like a bit of camber.
The B Pro C2 is also CRC, but with camber sections from the inserts to contact points. The difference I noticed between the two is that having cambered sections underfoot seemed to lock in a bit more than having them outside the bindings. At least for me anyway.
|02-23-2014 09:42 AM|
Originally Posted by GreyDragon View Post
|02-23-2014 04:00 AM|
I’m a fan of the Gnus; the Bpro…have demo’d and if were to buy another board it would be it or a billygoat c2 in the 156…really the billygoat and bpro are fairly similar…but slightly different as far as torsionally stiffness. I’m a guy with small feet and ride Baker….these board were designed for and at Baker. It is an aggressive, all mtn shred machine that will handle ice, pow, trees, blasting, natty and drops; and if you want a more aggressive board you have to start looking at men’s boards that are stiffer.
BTW, pop has nothing to do with length…its about camber profile and stiffness. Added length and more stiff will add stability at bombing speeds. The Bpro c3 version will have a bit more pop than the c2…but both c2 and c3 are relatively lifeless…if you want pop…go with a full cambered board. A cambered board will also give your more stability for bombing but will be slightly less playful and less agile compared to a c2…and a c3 will split the difference between a cambered and a c2. I personally found that the c3 did not make that much difference vs c2 compared to a cambered stiffy. I regularly ride a billygoat c2 159 split and an old fully cambered stiff twin 155….and a bpro would fit right in the middle..c3 for more stability and stiffness and a c2 for more agility…splitting hairs.
Rank based on my demoing
Billygoat=hyper aggressive…but smallest size is a 156
Bpro=aggressive…largest size is a 155…so perhaps a smaller version
Lady choice=more playful but only comes in a c2
Roxy eminence and infinity were both too flexy/noodlily for my liking.
There are also narrow versions of probably similar boards in the Lib tech line you might want to check out.
Anyway have no idea where you ride or your stats…but if you want to progress…imho get a bpro; my billygoat has certainly forced me to progress. When you venture in to advance/expert…its really about skills…you can make anything work…but having the right tool that allows you to do what you want is the ticket….and the differences in the board design becomes a personal choice based on subtleties.
|02-23-2014 12:41 AM|
hybrid rocker = more pop
|02-22-2014 11:58 PM|
Originally Posted by KellionBane View Post
You'll have to explain that connection to me please.
|02-22-2014 11:57 PM|
Haven't been on the C3BTX B Pro but have the C2BTX version. It's poppy enough for me and stable on landing the smaller stuff I do. Fun in the trees. It is on the stiffer side so it likes speed; however, when conditions are choppy I'll switch to my other (softer) board. Otherwise I'm fighting to not get tossed (east coast conditions).
Demoed a board recently that you may want to consider, the Launch Vice RC. This board was super fun; I really liked it. In uneven terrain where I'd want to dial it back with the B Pro, the Vice was pushable and stable. Did not take it into the trees as there are no glades at that hill, but it was fun through the bumps. I'm 120lbs and rode the 148 (the rep said ideally he'd put me on one size down from the 48).
Here's an excellent review 2014 Launch Vice RC Snowboard Used and Reviewed «
|02-22-2014 11:46 PM|
|holroyba||thanks just looked into it that looks a lot better than the other gnu board|
|02-22-2014 11:45 PM|
There's a few tricks to getting more pop or more stability out of your board. But it basically boils down to your weight and the size of the board... Longer boards are going to have less pop but more stability; shorter boards are going to have more pop. But if you have good weight control you can put your weight into your carves and get more stability.
And of course, if you want to go faster, try to find a board with a sintered base. It will hold more wax and of course make you go faster.
Might want to look at this board, I know a few people on here recommend it, and its pretty much good at everything: Ladies Choice – GNU.com EDIT: What ridinbend said. :P
|02-22-2014 11:40 PM|
|ridinbend||Consider gnu ladies choice|
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|