|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|12-16-2011 11:41 AM|
Originally Posted by skian View Post
|12-16-2011 11:22 AM|
|skian||I'm done with this one. You be safe out there. Hope you never need a 360.|
|12-16-2011 09:05 AM|
Originally Posted by Sick-Pow View Post
|12-16-2011 08:54 AM|
I linked you to a "real" world scenario. I don't agree with sick-pow very often, but he's dead on in his scenario.
I don't use D handle shovels btw. Doesn't fit well in my pack. I want a shovel I am going to be able to use...
|12-15-2011 06:31 PM|
killclimz let something go? that is funny.
240 for me in CO.
if i was back in tahoe, 300 minimum not this month though.....ha!~
|12-15-2011 06:25 PM|
|skian||I work with professionals to but don't feel the need to name drop here. You have turned a "what is your opinion" personal. We can go back and forth all day long. All those guys are sharp and also know their stuff. I know a few of those names. You have your opinion and I have mine. Carry your 300 I'll stick with my 240 unless im doing pit work. Light is right weight is great. Makes no difference Maritime, Continental or other. YOU DONT NEED A THREE HUNDRED in real world scenarios. Man glad we didn't get into a discussion on whether you need a D handle shovel or not. That could of got out of control. You be safe out there. I think we can let this one go.|
|12-15-2011 05:47 PM|
After working with several of the best professionals in the business. Ben Pritchard, Ethan Greene, Hacksaw, and others. I'll take their opinion. I think a 240cm probe is better than not having one. I don't agree with your generalization. Everything we bring out into the backcountry safety wise, is for the worst case scenario, when all else fails.
As far as for the report. The Northwest avalanche center does have a write up for it. You can read the PDF here. The first hand report which goes into more detail located on TGR here.
Without a 300cm probe, the victim would have likely been dead. You are telling me that these "casual backcountry users" shouldn't have been carrying a 300cm probe? This is why your statement is a dangerous generalization.
A 240cm probe is appropriate for a continental climate. You can argue it's okay for an intermountain climate. For a Maritime climate, a 300 cm probe is much more appropriate...
|12-15-2011 05:20 PM|
|skian||Look I respect your view, over the last 20 year i have developed a different one. I am in full agreement that a beacon probe and shovel are essential tools along with your brain from education which is really the key to safety not the tools or length of them. First is education, then If you just have a beacon evac can take 1-2 hours add a shovel cut that in half add a probe cut that in half. All four together are essential. There is no where out there to support necessity of a 300 over a 240 for the average bc rider. Avalanches suck only when you throw a human in there. One statistic we should all be looking at out there is how many of those human triggered slides where done when the conditions were not favorable. These tools are nothing if you don't know how to use them properly. Freak accident or not people need to learn to follow their skin tracks back instead of just jumping in. LIke to hear somebody way in that one has ever dug down three meters in an ablation zone and how long it took them and two can find some support to back your statement. Nothing wrong with carrying a 240. It's having the tool and knowing how to use it that is important.|
|12-15-2011 04:57 PM|
Since it is not a death, I can not pull a report from the avalanche database. Only the CAIC maintains reports for Colorado that include close calls.
Do a search at TGR in the forums. Baker burial or Baker avalanche should pull it up.
Avalanche debris in maritime and intercontinental climates can bury deep. How is it overkill to have a 300cm probe? 2 ounces? The weight penalty as I said is negligible and if you run into the situation where you need it, you'll be glad you had it.
|12-15-2011 04:42 PM|
Originally Posted by killclimbz View Post
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|