|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|12-05-2011 12:21 AM|
|Nivek||more often than not shop kids are knowledgeless dimwits. This is no exception. Companys are stiffer. Go for those.|
|12-05-2011 12:03 AM|
Originally Posted by Zakal View Post
|12-04-2011 11:49 PM|
Ive all but made up my mind to get some of the Companys, but I can't find any of these around locally (Australia) to get my hands on and look at, so I sent someone I know in Tahoe around to the local shop to have a look, and hopefully to try a pair of my boots in the bindings to make sure there's no size issues.
Something in particular I was looking out for was this "suction" effect on the K2s that Angry Snowboarder was praising, but mentioned that it may have been to do with his pairing of the Companys with his K2 boots. I don't have K2 boots, so I wanted to check it still fitted okay.
When my mate got to the store, one of the shoppies told him to look at the Rome 390 Bosses instead saying they were stiffer than the Companys.
Now, from what I've read, both in this thread and in other reviews etc, that is not even remotely correct. Rome seem to advertise the 390s as being middle of the road on their "poppy/buttery" scale (which i presume is a stiffness/flex scale), and most other reviews ive seen refer to teh 390s as being a park binding of average stiffness.
I don't really ride park at all. And whilst I wouldn't mind getting better at it and perhaps doing it more, im not about to buy a set of bindings suited to that more than what I actually do ride. Which is normally speed runs focussing on turns on groomed days, or powder on snowy days.
As far as my riding approach is concerned, its all about powder, and ive tried to set up all my gear for that. Everything else is just playing in between powder days, so if im not fully equipped to take on the park, so be it.
So the Companys are a better choice for me than the 390 Bosses right?
|11-26-2011 12:17 AM|
|11-25-2011 09:50 PM|
Its really up to what kind of binding feel you want. Metal frame and plastic base with mini disc is just going to feel different overall than unibody plastic with standard discs. They achieve they same spot in the market but feel very different.
Originally Posted by snowklinger View Post
|11-25-2011 06:43 PM|
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
I wouldn't say I have bad knees, but they're not great, and I am fairly tall and ride with a wide stance (I like to think it helps spread my weight out more in deep powder), so I was thinking the canting would be a good idea.
Is the canting good enough to rule out the Phantoms due to their lack of them? I guess put another, is the Phantoms shock absorption that much better than the Harshmellow system on the K2s to warrant losing canting?
I was leaning towards the phantoms (plus I like the look of them the best), but now im looking at the Companys cos I don't know if I want that auto-tech anyway.
|11-23-2011 02:04 PM|
nivek would you imply that the uprises are as soft as to be jib specific? i am NOT a jibber, pretty much all-mountain resort rider, kickers, side hits, back bowls when there is snow. i currently have ride contrabands and feel that they have very little response, lots of play, and would only be good for jibbing.
not looking for the ultra stiff ever, plus the 100buck difference seems nice, but i dont want to get uprises and find out i got another super soft unresponsive binding like the contraband.
was pretty much set on the uprises till i read what u said about them being a soft formula. care to elaborate?
|11-23-2011 11:20 AM|
Companys are stiffer overall. Stiffer but not heavier means more $$.
Airbags are my personal favorite dampening system in bindings. All the shock absorbtion you need but not so damp you lose feel.
Second to that is harshmellow and if you have bad knees Companys will be better than Phantoms being canted.
|11-23-2011 05:44 AM|
Originally Posted by Zakal View Post
|11-22-2011 05:31 PM|
Originally Posted by DanX View Post
So how soon are you going to be able to test them out and give us a first hand review? hehe
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|