Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Who honestly reads Snowboard Colorado? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-30-2012 10:59 AM
killclimbz The Breck article is awful. Serious grade school stuff, and not even that good. I think maybe Tyrant wrote it...

What is funny though, the cloud seeding article is actually decent.
01-30-2012 10:57 AM
linvillegorge
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbospartan View Post
I don't know how it would have gotten published other than a dude starting his own magazine and making his own rules.
That's pretty much exactly what it is.
01-30-2012 10:30 AM
grafta The way it's written does nothing for it's content... which is, er, lacking to say the least
01-30-2012 10:01 AM
turbospartan It was a little bro-mosexual, but I read another article (Cloud Seeding) and it didn't have nearly as much bro-brah in it.

I'm guessing they did it on purpose though, because if they didn't... I don't know how it would have gotten published other than a dude starting his own magazine and making his own rules.
01-30-2012 09:10 AM
BurtonAvenger
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroPhile View Post
I read the article. I got the sense that all the "bro-speak" and the whole article in general was written a quasi-ironic tone intentionally. Taking that into consideration, it wasn't that bad.
There's no irony they bag on bro's and then talk just like them. It's written like every fucking douche bag weekend warrior Boulderite talks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by linvillegorge View Post
Judging by the other shit these guys do, there's nothing "quasi-ironic" about any of the brotastic shit they say or do. They're "bros" to the core.

And when I say "bro", I mean fucking douchebags.
Nailed it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoFreshies View Post
you should write one of your signature rants to them (they do do a letter/feed back section dont they?) explaining how they are doing such a terrible job. Maybe they will put it in the mag and try to come up with some witty response.
I've got something in the works that is going to take care of this.
01-30-2012 02:03 AM
AcroPhile
Quote:
Originally Posted by linvillegorge View Post
Judging by the other shit these guys do, there's nothing "quasi-ironic" about any of the brotastic shit they say or do. They're "bros" to the core.

And when I say "bro", I mean fucking douchebags.
I can't speak for the rest of the magazine. I have only thumbed through it a few times before reading this article. It's just my initial impression. If this whole article was intended to be taken seriously, then it is an epic fail. I still suspect that this article is a bit tongue-in-cheek but who knows, maybe I'm giving them too much credit.
01-30-2012 01:59 AM
IdahoFreshies you should write one of your signature rants to them (they do do a letter/feed back section dont they?) explaining how they are doing such a terrible job. Maybe they will put it in the mag and try to come up with some witty response.
01-30-2012 01:52 AM
linvillegorge
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroPhile View Post
I read the article. I got the sense that all the "bro-speak" and the whole article in general was written a quasi-ironic tone intentionally. Taking that into consideration, it wasn't that bad.
Judging by the other shit these guys do, there's nothing "quasi-ironic" about any of the brotastic shit they say or do. They're "bros" to the core.

And when I say "bro", I mean fucking douchebags.
01-30-2012 01:49 AM
AcroPhile I read the article. I got the sense that all the "bro-speak" and the whole article in general was written a quasi-ironic tone intentionally. Taking that into consideration, it wasn't that bad.
01-30-2012 12:35 AM
BurtonAvenger
Quote:
Originally Posted by PanHandler View Post
Before you go all ape shit on them can you review those Dye goggles? hahaha
Already talked to Joel will have a pair in the next few weeks for review.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome