|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|11-03-2012 11:24 AM|
Originally Posted by Snowolf View Post
AK, I think that the direction is solid. It just seems to tread the line where maybe too much responsibility is being placed on the retailer. Yes they should have some basic knowledge and yes they should encourage awareness and education. Where they draw the line in important though in our sue happy country.
|11-03-2012 11:00 AM|
Of course this is good for the industry and everyone who ride the BC
I'm not sure if anyone else actually read the article, but the industry is basically making a decision to combine its resources and knowledge in an effort to improve upon information and resources available to the BC accessing public.
Its making it a goal to make the information and terminology more uniform (so you powderdorks can actually understand the terminology when you read or talk to someone about it) and provide it in a way that is consistent and more readily available. They also want to educate you on what resources are available to you, SO YOU CAN MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW before you go hike a snow covered ridge and kill yourself or others.
This is good for the industry and for you. You still make the decision about how smart or dumb you want to be about BC safety.
Cheers to a safe and snowy winter.
|11-02-2012 02:59 PM|
Too be honest, I have yet to run into somebody on a splitboard that doesn't have some basic knowledge and isn't carrying any gear. Not saying I wouldn't help. Already been there done that in several situations. If you look at the accidents from last season, most of them were caused by people who had education, gear etc. You can't just blame the uninformed. As easy as it is.
Again, my attitude is to lead the horse to water. If they don't drink, that is not my fault. You can't force people to make the smart choice.
Of course dropping in on top of me on an avalanche slope could very well get that person killed, and there is a good chance it wouldn't be by an avalanche...
|11-02-2012 02:24 PM|
|snowvols||Yea I agree with Wolf. If you are on a ridge line over and someone triggers a slide you would go help them right? Sucks that they did that to themselves, but I know I would change plans and opt to help the party in trouble.|
|11-02-2012 01:47 PM|
|killclimbz||Not all companies have Voile's labels. I tend to agree with Shred too. Though I do firmly believe as group as a whole, we are responsible for bringing awareness to the table. If the end user chooses to ignore it, then I am okay with it. Hopefully it doesn't bite them in the ass. If it does, I tried. Hence my involvement with FOBP.|
|11-02-2012 01:19 PM|
|11-02-2012 09:55 AM|
Originally Posted by snowvols View Post
Whether that's simply a large label on BC products stating "EXTREME RISK: Using this product without the proper knowledge, training and experience can result in death... so take an avalanche course eh!?!" or something along those lines might help.
I think what they're saying is as an industry they need to help make people aware of the potential risk involved in BC riding. I think it's a smart move, as the alternative is to wait until it comes to a head after increasing fatality rates.
|11-01-2012 04:23 PM|
BC gates should merely state.
"You are on your own.
There will be no rescue nor lawsuits.
Are you confident in your skills and
Have been good to your friends?"
|11-01-2012 04:21 PM|
|killclimbz||Companies should promote awareness. Especially those who are in the business of selling gear that is used in the backcountry. Take responsibility? Not so sure on that. If Joe Blow wants to buy a splitboard, it is not up to the retailer to make sure they are prepared. Joe Blow could buying the board for a Level I they are taking for all we know. snowvols is right, it is up to the person to take responsibility for what they are doing.|
|11-01-2012 04:14 PM|
Originally Posted by wrathfuldeity View Post
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|