|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|Today 05:19 AM|
Originally Posted by Mahihkan View Post
Stoked that you are getting a new deck! To keep the terms clear, The Chairmain is a CRC model and the Flagship is RCR. There are big differences in the way these perform in relation to true rocker and true camber. Your Chairman had a lot more weighted surface contact length than would true rocker boards and the Flagship will have significantly less than a true cambered board. The transitions from camber to rocker on the Flagship begin early with the nose rocker being very long (the RCR is directional). Let's get your basics so we can know better where the Chairman fell short for you.
cm size of your Chairman
Typical Riding Area
|Yesterday 08:09 PM|
I am an old school freerider. I love my carves. Last year I picked up my first rockered board. A Never Summer Chairman. While I adjusted to it, I never did fall in love with it. I am going back to a cambered board this year. Right now I am eyeballing the Jones Flagship which is cambered under foot, however appears to have a touch of rocker at the contact points tip and tail. My question is, how will this feel when I ride it? For those who know Traditional camber to ride it, how does the bit of rocker tip and tail feel to carve in comparison?
|11-28-2015 05:33 PM|
Originally Posted by ridinbend View Post
|11-28-2015 05:11 PM|
Pretty decent guide to a lot of companies various camber types.
Guide to snowboard camber types -
|06-30-2015 11:06 AM|
Profile is a single factor in the much broader performance picture. For example there are "damp" camber boards and very harsh feelling camber boards. That attribute is primarily impacted by core materials, thickness distribution, and laminates. Profile has much less of a role there.
To answer you Q about the the Hot Knife, it is a camber board. The subtle dip in the middle is a nuance feature and does not dramatically impact ride. So, rest assured, you have ridden camber (although only one flavor).
The Attack Banana is a fairly neutral design but EC2 possibly goes further than you would like in terms of relaxed profile for your east coast riding as described above (especially for more "normal" years that this past season).
The Rider's Choice is the Money board in Gnu's line for All Mountain. C2 is a highly versatile profile and the other elements have been balanced to match. This would be my choice for you.
|06-30-2015 10:40 AM|
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
I'm in new england so I don't prefer having a pow board, split board, etc, I'd rather just have 1 or 2 all mountain boards. I have the hot knife which I found pretty bad in powder (talking 20-30 inches). Maybe setting it back would have helped. I also didn't care for the hot knife in large mogules because I didn't find it damp at all, at least compared to a never summer SL.
Being that I've never ridden camber, how much does the hot knife actually replicate camber? Is it really close, or somewhere between camber and something like the C2?
Anyway, I've been looking into the gnu riders choice C2 PBTX, attack banana EC2 BTX, and the trs XC2 BTX. Do either of these profiles prove more damp than the C3 or better in powder? Carving? Faster base? (co-sintered hot knife vs the TNT base).
|06-30-2015 09:02 AM|
Originally Posted by Bertieman View Post
Mervin (Gnu, Lib, Roxy) has a complex naming structure for their line. It is important to note that they actually use unique profiles within many of their named categories so in reality there are more than the eight general profiles that they actually detail for Lib and Gnu. In terms of the general categories we are using for this thread. the Lib and Gnu lines can be simplified to:
Camber: TT, C3 BTX (camber with a dip)
Rocker: BTX, !BTX! (rocker with double dips)
CRC: C2 BTX, EC2 BTX, XC2 BTX, C1 BTX (specialty directional)
I will be happy to compare specific models for you which is a lot more valuable than the generalities above. Let me know what you are looking at
|06-29-2015 11:56 PM|
|Bertieman||Hey wired, any chance you could write up a different explanation for the lib tech model profiles, if you've had the experience with them?|
|03-30-2015 07:17 AM|
Originally Posted by TooNice View Post
A couple of important notes.
1. This is the least energetic profile. There is no inherent stored energy in flat rock.
2. The stability mentioned is primary stability which comes from having a large flat surface to stand on. This does not equate to stability at speed. That tends to come from long contact lengths ( which flat rock does not have) and readily planted effective edge.
|03-27-2015 03:57 PM|
Originally Posted by TooNice View Post
used to love it, but got a capita doa this season and when i tried my old capita indoor suvival this season i hated it, felt super sloppy when turning...
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|