Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Coda and Wasteland Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-24-2013 08:29 PM
jdang307 Arbor confuses themselves on their boards. They've given me contradictory answers a few times.

Coda = Fun. Wondering what the new shape will bring.
01-24-2013 03:47 PM
scotty100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basti View Post
I find that Arbor aren't very good at describing their boards. I have a Coda and held the Wasteland in my hands. These boards aren't really comparable even though the description on Arbors website could make you think so. As seriouscat said, the Wasteland feels stiffer. That's not on-snow experience though. Just what I've found during flex tests at a store.
+100 to that. I find Arbor's board mapping matrix a waste of space. They need to do a better job describing the differences between their boards...if you didn't know better everything would seem to be mid flex...
01-24-2013 03:23 PM
djsaad1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basti View Post
I find that Arbor aren't very good at describing their boards. I have a Coda and held the Wasteland in my hands. These boards aren't really comparable even though the description on Arbors website could make you think so. As seriouscat said, the Wasteland feels stiffer. That's not on-snow experience though. Just what I've found during flex tests at a store.

On that note I am going to go with what I know, and I know I really liked the Coda.
01-24-2013 03:13 PM
Basti I find that Arbor aren't very good at describing their boards. I have a Coda and held the Wasteland in my hands. These boards aren't really comparable even though the description on Arbors website could make you think so. As seriouscat said, the Wasteland feels stiffer. That's not on-snow experience though. Just what I've found during flex tests at a store.
01-24-2013 03:04 PM
djsaad1
Quote:
Originally Posted by seriouscat View Post
Dude you ever seen the wasteland in person? It's definitely stiffer than coda.
Thats odd, the website shows the wasteland as more of a park/all mountain board while showing the coda as more freeride/all mountain. You would think the coda would be stiffer.

Arbor
01-24-2013 02:57 PM
seriouscat
Coda and Wasteland

Dude you ever seen the wasteland in person? It's definitely stiffer than coda.
01-24-2013 12:31 PM
djsaad1
Coda and Wasteland

I had a coda and loved it until it got stolen.

I was about to buy another one but then noticed the wasteland. It seems like its the same shape with a different core.

Am I going to notice much of a difference with the wasteland? I like the top sheet more on the wasteland that's why I was thinking about changing.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome