|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|03-04-2013 08:51 AM|
For Highbacks the Force is stiffer than the SL's and MC's torsionally. But you can't really compare because the Force flex pattern is symmetric, whereas the SL and MC's stiffness changes based on the pressure applied to particular parts of the highback.
|03-03-2013 09:55 PM|
Therefore, overall stiffness: Force > SL > MC. Which is how all our shops have marketed them - and incidentally entirely consistent with my personal experience.
|03-03-2013 08:51 PM|
|DrEwTiMe||It actually seems like both of them would rather not rate them on stiffness but were forced to because of questions. So its a matter of opinion it seems...|
|03-03-2013 05:09 PM|
|hktrdr||here and here.|
|03-03-2013 04:54 PM|
Well then you're not correct, there is no way the SL is stiffer the the MC. The MC High back is a solid piece where the SL is not. In addition to that, the MC high back is made out of carbon fiber which is rigid and responsive, the SL has a carved out asymmetrical polymer type substance high back which is where that torsional flex comes from. As you can see they are completely opposite in terms of flexibility. Until this year when the charger beats out everything in terms of stiffness the SL's were a step under the MC Metafuse. Google reviews of the MC and they will tell you the same thing I am.
Like my original post said, I cant comment on the other parts of their line, so you may be right about those. But until the charger was redone this year the MC was top then came the SL.
|03-03-2013 03:48 PM|
|hktrdr||I did, about 10 hours before your post|
|03-03-2013 01:27 PM|
|03-02-2013 10:10 PM|
Originally Posted by alex12 View Post
|03-02-2013 10:02 PM|
|03-02-2013 09:46 PM|
Originally Posted by crash77 View Post
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|