Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Advice on 2nd board, used or less expensive possibly. Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-06-2013 12:06 AM
wrathfuldeity
Quote:
Originally Posted by cootcraig View Post
Can anyone tell about this K2 HC161? I guess it would be a traditional camber, but what would be the stiffness rating? How different is this from a newer camber with rocker tips style?

I still a newbie, but on the greens and easier blues this board is easy to ride at moderate speed. I'm enjoying dialing in different types of turn. Last time out there was 9" of new wet snow and another 2" fell in the morning. I challenged myself on longer steeper runs sections with moguls, after an hour it was chopped up and more difficult. I ended up with my rear leg burning and tired. I would like the new board to help in these conditions.

On a previous day with 20" of lighter snow I did not have to work so much on keeping the nose up.

So far, the c2btx type profile, is what I will be looking for. I'm not sure how to factor in stiffness.
well on a 20" fresh ur just going to need something with some float...so 3 boards...groomer board, an rc or billy and a pow. The billy will blast some good pow but it is not a deep pow board...i'd say its limits is 16-20" deep on 40+ depreed slope...low angle...no
03-05-2013 11:57 PM
wrathfuldeity
Quote:
Originally Posted by cootcraig View Post
I will be looking for a second board for next season.

Some background on me:
60 years old. 165 pounds. Size 8.5 to 9 boot.
First year snowboarding, been out 6 times this season so far.
Will shoot for 12 sessions next year.

Style is freeride. I'm looking for a board that will support
advancing in powder, steeps, bumps and trees.
I favor versatility at lower speeds over higher speed capability.

Gnu Billy Goat 156 is at the top of my list.

Topics for discussion:
* Wisdom of used versus new.
* Boards to consider.
On the goat you got to be pretty aggressive on it...its a fun ride and shall we say "forgiving" if you are aggressive and charge...but not necessairly relaxing...it wants to take off and go...I'm 180, small feet and have a 159 split...got about 12-15 days on it...got it under control...but it wants to take off.

If you want versatility at lower speeds and advancing in powder steeps bumps and trees....go with a rider's choice in 154.5...its more controllable without having to be aggressive and is still agile/nimble and fast enough. Actually I'm going to try to pick up one used for more relaxed riding...btw I've also spent time some time on it.

edit...on second read...ur a newbie still working on blues and greens...get the rider's choice...the goat will take you for a ride
03-05-2013 11:34 PM
poutanen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
thred hijack! poutanen im in need of set of bindings...are they decent?
PM sent...
03-05-2013 10:12 PM
Banjo
Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
I recently bought a Burton Custom for $220, including bindings which I'll sell for about $70.
thred hijack! poutanen im in need of set of bindings...are they decent?
03-05-2013 09:36 PM
Weipim
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_z View Post
I don't think they have made the HC in over a decade. Specifically, if you have the one that I think you have, it is a 1995 model. Flex- or anything-wise on a board this old, and one that has been used as part of a rental fleet, is going to be tough to compare. Chances are the one you have is pretty beat up and broken down. The HC did have a full wood core in the mid-1990s though, which is good. A lot of brands back then were using foam composite cores that break down significantly over time.

In any case the HC would definitely be traditional camber - and that would be true even if it was as new as 2008 or 2009 (which again, they were not making the HC that recently).

The newere R-C-R style is going to ride a lot like traditonal camber, with a bit more play in the tips and should be a bit easier to keep "up" in the deep stuff. Nothing is going to completely alleviate that rear leg burn, except riding powder all the time. It's just a different use of the muscles, and for most of us, it's unfortunately infrequent
Agree, the RCR really revived the camber as a core design between the insert. however i'm still not sold on the "floatability" of my camrocks(the greats and rossi angus)
03-05-2013 09:21 PM
linvillegorge If your heart is set on a Billy Goat, then get it. I think it would fit your desires pretty well.
03-05-2013 09:04 PM
david_z I don't think they have made the HC in over a decade. Specifically, if you have the one that I think you have, it is a 1995 model. Flex- or anything-wise on a board this old, and one that has been used as part of a rental fleet, is going to be tough to compare. Chances are the one you have is pretty beat up and broken down. The HC did have a full wood core in the mid-1990s though, which is good. A lot of brands back then were using foam composite cores that break down significantly over time.

In any case the HC would definitely be traditional camber - and that would be true even if it was as new as 2008 or 2009 (which again, they were not making the HC that recently).

The newere R-C-R style is going to ride a lot like traditonal camber, with a bit more play in the tips and should be a bit easier to keep "up" in the deep stuff. Nothing is going to completely alleviate that rear leg burn, except riding powder all the time. It's just a different use of the muscles, and for most of us, it's unfortunately infrequent
03-05-2013 08:54 PM
cootcraig
Quote:
Originally Posted by cootcraig View Post
My first board is a K2 HC161 I bought used.
Can anyone tell about this K2 HC161? I guess it would be a traditional camber, but what would be the stiffness rating? How different is this from a newer camber with rocker tips style?

I still a newbie, but on the greens and easier blues this board is easy to ride at moderate speed. I'm enjoying dialing in different types of turn. Last time out there was 9" of new wet snow and another 2" fell in the morning. I challenged myself on longer steeper runs sections with moguls, after an hour it was chopped up and more difficult. I ended up with my rear leg burning and tired. I would like the new board to help in these conditions.

On a previous day with 20" of lighter snow I did not have to work so much on keeping the nose up.

So far, the c2btx type profile, is what I will be looking for. I'm not sure how to factor in stiffness.
03-05-2013 07:41 PM
david_z
Quote:
Originally Posted by cootcraig View Post
The only sticker is for "The Edge" ski/board shop in Pueblo, it had been one of their rentals.
haha no worries. TBH I would not be surprised to learn that my friend is still riding that old thing. He's kind of a hippie like that.
03-05-2013 07:28 PM
cootcraig
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_z View Post
Did it happen to have any identifying stickers on it?
The only sticker is for "The Edge" ski/board shop in Pueblo, it had been one of their rentals.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome