Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: Nitro Team Gullwing W vs. NS Legacy vs NS Heritage X Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-24-2013 10:48 PM
jdang307
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSurfer View Post
Like I said before, that is a statement only someone with tiny little feet would continue to repeat.

To the OP, if you get a chance check out the Nitro Blacklight they offer it in camber and GW. Its a mid wide so the waist width should be ok for your size 12's.
As soemone with very tiny feet (7.5 boots, hey my wife is happy ) waist width isn't irrelevant, but isn't determinative by itself either.

It's a guideline though. That tells you in general if a board is worth looking at, or completely out of the question.

I rode a Coda which was way too wide for my feets but it was ok, probably due to the rocker shape. Perfectly fine turning on the board. Also I've ridden the Rome Shank which is a bit wider than normal, same thing.

I want to get on a really narrow board to see if there is a difference. Two would be the TRS Slim or the Yes TDF.
03-24-2013 06:01 PM
Dago91 Honestly I think the advice that you are getting is spot on. My friend is a Pro rider and he said that the rider weight is really what you want to look at.. also boot size.

For Instance, I am 6'4 195lbs size 12 US boot and I ride a 162cm Wide board. Now I could go down to a 161cm or up to a 163cm but no more then that.

I think the real question you need to ask yourself is this.. are you going to gain a significant amount of weight during the lifespan that you plan on riding this board? If so I would size up a bit.. to put this in perspective your thumb nail is about 2cm, thats the menial size diffrence we are talking about here.
03-20-2013 08:07 AM
SilverSurfer
Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
Waist width by itself is irrelevant. It is meaningless without the other information I mentioned.
Like I said before, that is a statement only someone with tiny little feet would continue to repeat.

To the OP, if you get a chance check out the Nitro Blacklight they offer it in camber and GW. Its a mid wide so the waist width should be ok for your size 12's.
03-19-2013 07:44 PM
Babs OK, thank you all for all your advices and responses. I will probably stop at Legacy 159, unless will have a chance to try something else any time soon - Nitro seems to be a bit too big for me (despite perhaps a very good total deal I would get on my current rental board), Heritage perhaps is a bit too advanced for me (despite how I would love to have carbonium ), so Legacy would be a safe bet. Not really sure I get any good deals available in Europe, but then will have to wait for next year models to show up. Again - thank you for all responses, but if you still have any other suggestion of thoughts - please share, as there seem to be not so many comparisons of those boards (except perhaps SL vs Heritage)
03-19-2013 02:44 AM
Triple8Sol Didn't read through the other posts, but figured I'd chime in since I've owned all 3: Team Gullwing, SL, and Heritage. The Heritage is stiffer than the other 2, and probably more than you need. For the other two they're both very good boards. The SL 158 has more effectgive edge than the TGW 159, and the latter is a click softer. I ended up keeping my SL and selling the TGW at the time because they were so similar, there was no point in keeping both. Pretty much get the one you can find a better deal on.
03-18-2013 07:27 PM
hktrdr
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSurfer View Post
If you had normal sized feet you would never have said "Waist width is irrelevant".
But now you are saying waist width is an important part of the equation.
I think you are getting your made up facts confused.
Waist width by itself is irrelevant. It is meaningless without the other information I mentioned.
03-18-2013 05:46 PM
trapper
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babs View Post
Also taking Heritage X vs Legacy question - is Heritage really not for advanced beginners? The reason is that I've tried yesterday some very short backcountry route through the woods, and really enjoyed and liked it. However, it was very difficult, and I am not really sure if that was only my incompetence or Nitro Team Gullwing fault as well... Taking that into consideration: can I choose Heritage and then "grow into" it slowly? or that would be too steep change and better take Legacy and then perhaps Heritage or similar after few years of practise?
Like I said, I'm just finishing my second full season of riding. I've been on my new Heritage X 166 for a few weeks now and the board has been great. Really outstanding compared to my first board which was a full rocker and technically more forgiving in terms of edge catches. Still had no problem riding this board after a couple of hours adjusting to it. But, one of the big differences between you and I is our size and specifically weight. Board stiffness is relative to that and something like a Heritage is going to feel a lot softer to me that it would for you.

My advice if you can't try them out? Research the hell out of them from all sources, including here. But in the end, I took the advice of a few people on here that really know their shit and bought the model and size suggested to me. If people here that know what's up (which is not a category I fall under) are saying you're better suited for a Legacy in a 159 or whatever size they are saying, then that's probably the route you should go.
03-18-2013 05:34 PM
Babs OK, OK guys, appreciate your responses, but you do not have to make a war out of it Out of talking to several other people and hearing your responses I believe Legacy shall be sort of 159cm size, the only questions it's width (referring to the sizing chart, where it says that 159 is till size 11) ... I know, it also depends on actual foot size and etc. but it is not that easy...

Also taking Heritage X vs Legacy question - is Heritage really not for advanced beginners? The reason is that I've tried yesterday some very short backcountry route through the woods, and really enjoyed and liked it. However, it was very difficult, and I am not really sure if that was only my incompetence or Nitro Team Gullwing fault as well... Taking that into consideration: can I choose Heritage and then "grow into" it slowly? or that would be too steep change and better take Legacy and then perhaps Heritage or similar after few years of practise?
03-18-2013 02:47 PM
SilverSurfer
Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
Not clear why you think that I have 'tiny feet' - or, in fact, what my (or your) foot size has to do with this.

You are wrong to suggest that "that every guy with big feet looks at" waist width. If they have sense, they consider width at the inserts.

The reason that manufacturers do not list width at the inserts is simply (and obviously) that the width varies along the board/for the different inserts, so that there is no single number.
The approach of taking the average of waist width and of nose/tail width to get a rough estimate for width at the inserts is fine - and is something that I have mentioned on several times before.
If you had normal sized feet you would never have said "Waist width is irrelevant".
But now you are saying waist width is an important part of the equation.
I think you are getting your made up facts confused.
03-18-2013 02:02 PM
hktrdr
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSurfer View Post
Says the guy with tiny feet.

What board company list the width at the insert/binding positions? I'll answer for you, none.

To say waist width is irrelevant is wrong. It is something that every guy with big feet looks at, that is a fact (I know I have size 13's). Combine waist width with tip/tail width and side cut its not exact but it will give you a good idea about the width of the overall board.
Not clear why you think that I have 'tiny feet' - or, in fact, what my (or your) foot size has to do with this.

You are wrong to suggest that "that every guy with big feet looks at" waist width. If they have sense, they consider width at the inserts.

The reason that manufacturers do not list width at the inserts is simply (and obviously) that the width varies along the board/for the different inserts, so that there is no single number.
The approach of taking the average of waist width and of nose/tail width to get a rough estimate for width at the inserts is fine - and is something that I have mentioned on several times before.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome