Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - Reply to Topic
Thread: 2014 Burton Custom Flying V Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
09-19-2013 08:45 PM
Lamps
Quote:
Originally Posted by KentoBento View Post
SOOO, A solid meh?

Is it on the soft side of generalist or the stiffer side?
Also, I am like 180 lb and I heard Burton boards are made for lighter riders and thus the heavier you are, the softer it gets, is that true?
I haven't ridden the 2014, 2013 was in my opinion medium or slightly on the stiff side, but still fine for butters etc., its an all around board.

I weight 185, own three different burton boards between 158 and 163, I think if I understand your question, does Burton's longer boards shortchange the top of the weight range, I would say not, stiffness matches my needs across the sizes above.
09-19-2013 08:45 PM
hktrdr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamps View Post
I think that as an example, if the Flying V and camber versions are same stiffness the FV shape would still have a much higher 'fun factor'. FV turns easier, has a looser, skatey feel etc. the cambered version would be more precise, less forgiving, catchier, but have better edge hold.

On a related note I have always wondered generally about super high tech boards that are noncambered, to me high tech means lightweight and stiff, and I would think that the stiffness aspects are more desirable in cambered boards.
Sorry, but that is nonsense - especially the stiffness part. Most high-tech boards tend to be around mid-flex and some are even on the soft side - Burton Antler, NS Proto, etc.
09-19-2013 07:21 PM
KentoBento SOOO, A solid meh?

Is it on the soft side of generalist or the stiffer side?
Also, I am like 180 lb and I heard Burton boards are made for lighter riders and thus the heavier you are, the softer it gets, is that true?
09-19-2013 09:05 AM
Lamps
Quote:
Originally Posted by KentoBento View Post
Last Year, This Year unrelated. How much does the Custom (Flying V and camber) flex. I always thought it was a stiff, kind of like a more aggressive process. Should I want to butter and jib, is the custom not really made for that kind of riding?
I think that the concept of the custom is an all round board, so you can ride it pretty much anywhere, it's a good one board quiver, or a good primary board that you could supplement with a specialized board or more.

Eg you have a custom for most days and a park board or pow board or both to complement it for days you know that's what you want.

I suspect it will compare well vs other generalist sticks but of course can't hold it's own against a specialist board in the specific application.
09-19-2013 08:59 AM
Lamps
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntipodeanSam View Post
So will the 45 degree carbon highlights improve the edge hold and nose/tail chatter the reviews have complained about?

If so will the board become stiffer (I see they still rate it as a 5 for flex in the new catalogue), therefore less fun to play around on and defeating the object of having this alternative to the camber?!
I think that as an example, if the Flying V and camber versions are same stiffness the FV shape would still have a much higher 'fun factor'. FV turns easier, has a looser, skatey feel etc. the cambered version would be more precise, less forgiving, catchier, but have better edge hold.

On a related note I have always wondered generally about super high tech boards that are noncambered, to me high tech means lightweight and stiff, and I would think that the stiffness aspects are more desirable in cambered boards.
09-18-2013 09:02 PM
KentoBento Last Year, This Year unrelated. How much does the Custom (Flying V and camber) flex. I always thought it was a stiff, kind of like a more aggressive process. Should I want to butter and jib, is the custom not really made for that kind of riding?
05-10-2013 07:08 AM
VHILW
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntipodeanSam View Post
Haha, just intrigued if there is a noticeable difference in flex this year.
Did the comparison (by hand) against the 2013 CFV and nothing noticeable. Felt pretty much the same. I reckon the 2 board need to be ridden side by side to notice the subtle differences. But I can tell u 2014 feels lighter.
05-10-2013 04:31 AM
AntipodeanSam Haha, just intrigued if there is a noticeable difference in flex this year.
05-10-2013 04:20 AM
hktrdr
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntipodeanSam View Post
Yeah I meant the push test, you can generally get a decent feel for it
Good luck with that.
05-10-2013 01:56 AM
AntipodeanSam
Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
See highlighted bit...
Yeah I meant the push test, you can generally get a decent feel for it
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome