![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 98
|
So basically i hate seeing the edge of goggles. I had some basic Dicks sporting goods/ zumiez smith and oakleys. I tried on a pair of some EG2s and was like "Good looorrrd i have been saved" I didn't know they made goggles with that big of a lens. Its just stupid huge. yes i know im late on finding these.
Questions Who elese makes big gigantic goggles like these? they fit my big face and i could see EVERYTHING. also the lens was like a mirror ish thing. it was cool. they were 160. and i was like......maaan. So who else makes big googles like this that are awesome. and where can i get them for less than 160? Also i always have issues with fog (place goggles on head because they are uncomfortable) hows the anti fog on these and where is a good place to hold your goggles if they aren't on your face? (around neck?) Some basic questions. Im also super hyped because Upstate NY got snow. So yea let me know |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,446
|
I/O is pretty big, and Smith's lens tech (you also get 2 lenses with the I/O) is the best in the business.
The frame on the Feenom is only 7mm shorter than the EG2. However, the EG2 lens is further outwards. The face fit is nearly identical. EG2 definitely has a larger FOV. Comparison of the Feenom to the I/O: ![]()
__________________
Last edited by legallyillegal; 12-09-2009 at 11:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 98
|
yea i hear a lot of good things about smith tech. i like the look of the I/o. looks bigger in pictures.
So actually the IO is bigger than the eg2? wow. so far i hear most people say the I/o or the lobes are a better deal than the eg2. +2 for smith for extra lenses too. aghhh so many choices. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 108
|
All of the goggles mentioned in here are pretty damn expensive, 140$ plus. If you can stand even a small amount of perhipheral cut off then you will definitely save some money... I tried on the spy trevors today and those had a pretty wide FOV and were like 70 bucks.
I'm also liking my dragon DX's, for my face the fit and FOV is not so bad. With the I/O's and POCs youre going to be spending a ton of cash. At that point you might as well get what you really want, spend the extra money and get the EG2's. EDIT: the dragons cut off part of the vertical, but side to side vision is pretty good with them.
__________________
Last edited by leif; 12-09-2009 at 11:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 5,373
|
Ashbury or Airblaster. Both under $100 with good FOV. Not spherical though. The Ashburys have the most comfortable material-to-face I've tried, and the Airblasters give a really good fit for a broad spectrum of face shapes. Lots of conformability.
__________________
Snowboarding Sucks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|