![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 769
|
I think generally you can't get the same level of waterproofing on a soft shell.
Also, im not sure how it works for snowboarding but i know with climbing/mountainering snags and durability come into play. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
The Rooster King
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,387
|
Quote:
a shell has no insulation, is very waterproof, is somewhat breathable in the right conditions, windproof. a softshell often has some light insulation, can be waterproof (more and more are made with goretex/goretex-style laminates) are generally very breathable, and are softer and quieter than a shell, more puncture resistant. shell: a very waterproof outer layer softshell: a very breathable outer layer, can be used as a light insulating layer, may be used as a waterproof outer layer. part of the problem with defining them is that a softshell is kind of an ambiguous term. when they first came out they were all hoodless, insulated, either windstopper or not, and meant for use under a shell or alone during high-aerobic activity. now softshells have evolved into actual shells, that are soft. so a three layer laminate that is(?) waterproof, very moveable, nearly as light or as light as a hard shell, with no insulation at all. so part of it could easily be: what kind of softshell are we talking about?
__________________
get the hell off my lawn. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|