Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums banner

Gopro mount advice

26K views 52 replies 13 participants last post by  Triple8Sol 
#1 ·
So I just got the gopro hero 3 silver and I've been thinking of how to mount it.

The helmet mount I don't like because of trees and somersaults.

The board mount is too low for powder days.

The chest strap is cool, but that would aim sideways.

I'm thinking a mid thigh mount would be best.

Anyone have any insight on this mount, pros or cons?

Any other suggestions welcome too.

Thanks and merry Christmas.
 
#2 ·
The reason why the helmet mount is the best is because the camera is generally looking where you're looking. On your thigh, you're going to see the mountain wildly whipping around as you make turns, or you'll just see the side as you slow down. You can always put a mount on your board and only use it when pow isn't deep, but snowboards tend to vibrate a lot, even stiff ones. The chest doesn't HAVE to look to the side...you can angle the camera, but again, you're going get seasick watching your vids, as you'll see every turn magnified. That's why most people where them on their helmets (sorry Torpedo, god of all things cool). You're more likely to record where you're actually going, not the moves your body is making.

The other option, of course, is to mount it on a pole. Won't help with the trees or somersaults, but you'll get an interesting perspective (I've never tried it, because I don't like having a long pointy thing in my hand as I'm bombing down the mountain.
 
#3 ·
Well shit. I really want to use this thing but I just don't like the idea of helmet mount.

Watched a board mount and it looked good, but it was groomer riding.

Now that I think about it helmet mount wouldn't be pegged to the tip of your board either, cause the head naturally isn't tipped straight forward.

Seems like a much easier deal for skiers. H,mmmm, thoughts??
 
#4 ·
The GoPro comes with several different mounts. Straps (for helmet and chest), permanent adhesives (curved and flat for surfboards/snowboards and helmets), plus handle bar mounts, arm straps, etc. And the helmet mount pivots, it doesn't just point straight forward. You can easily point it down so it is tracking right in front of you. With the wide-angle lens setting (there are several settings), you'll get the whole mountain. There is a reason why virtually all of the video you see, GoPro or the others, is either a pole mount or a helmet mount; every other part of your body is moving all over the place. The board, too. Ideally, if you have the money, you get a couple of them and mount one to your board, one to you helmet and one to a pole. Then edit them all together when you're home wondering where your $900 went.
 
#5 ·
Lol... One cam is enough. Just want to set it and forget it. Edit it later. I don't see how a static helmet cam works on a snowboarder when the head is turning so drastically.

Seems like a board mount or lower leg mount would be more static and orientated the right direction no matter what the upper body is doing.

I figure it's trial and error, which a lot of people on here should have experience with.

You're right on the helmet mount though, that's all I ever see a side from the pole mount.
 
#6 ·
The head ISN'T turning so drastically. You should generally be watching where you're going, which means you'll be getting steadier video. Think of how much you whip the board around in turns, etc. On steeps you get sick watching it...hop turn, see the trees on the left, hop turn, see the trees on your left. You'd get whiplash just watching it...but your head tends to be looking where you are going (or about to go). Your hips and legs and the board are turning all over the place, though.
 
#7 ·
I have a Contour rather than a GoPro, but the idea is the same. I mount mine on my helmet sometimes, plus I have a frankenpole. The head-mount is ideal for filming someone else while you're following them down the slope, because the viewpoint follows where you're looking. One problem with snowboarders though is that your head isn't necessarily totally vertical. With the Contour you can rotate the lens to compensate. Not sure what you'd do with the GoPro.

The Pole mount allows you to see what you're doing, either from the front or the back. But it throws you off a bit until you get used to it, and you can't really do things like spins off jumps.

Ideally the best place for a cam if you want to record yourself, is on a pole in the hands of a friend or on the helmet of a friend.
 
#8 ·
if you're going to film someone else the pole out in front and above is good, but the best thing really is to just hold it in your hand and point it at someone like ironman's blaster thingie...

if you're filming yourself and you don't ride like xavier or jj or trice or whoeverthefuck is way better than most of us the only real useable, watchable footage is from a pole mount. period.

and you absolutely CAN spin off jumps with a pole mount.. i don't know where that's coming from...
 
#9 ·
Was hoping to film the run as I see it, so that would be board mount, helmet mount, or leg mount. Starting to sound like a PITA.

It would be alright if the cam just ran all the time and you didn't have to fuck with it unless you wanted to pull footage that was worth pulling.

Maybe I'll get some skis and face forward all day. .....
 
#11 ·
That all you do. Turn it on, snap it to your helmet. There is ONE button...click it, it starts recording. With a good SD card, it will record for hours. Click once to start, click once to stop. Nothing else to do, no PITA. People are making way too much a big deal about it. I'll just repeat, though, think of all the rapid motion and vibration your board goes through. Think of all the movements your leg is making. That is why the helmet mount is best...it essentially just looks where you're looking, and you'll get much smoother POV video. If you want to watch YOURSELF riding, mount it on your board and point it back up at you instead of pointing it forward. Again, no PITA, just click once and it starts recording. No big deal.
 
#12 ·
With helmet mount thoug, isn't that getting in the way when ducking in the trees? I do some good summersaults throughout the day, seems like that would be an issue also.

I already have dents in my helmet from the trees. Seems like when I'm trying to duck just enough to make the tree I'm naturally only accounting for my head and skimming the helmet. The camera would clothesline me!!

It's an REI thing so I can take it back whenever.

And I too never got the point of filming with a pole,,,
 
#13 ·
Yeah, if you're in tight trees and you're skimming branches that much, then I could see it being an issue if you mount it to the top of your helmet. Someone has to make a camera that's built in your goggles! If Zeal hasn't done it already...they already have goggles with a heads up GPS display and run tracker.
 
#14 ·
Ya, as much as I want to really like that thing I don't see myself using it past day 2 or 3.

I've been complaining about getting simpler and simpler not adding shit to make gearing up and riding more complicated.

Goggles would be sweet. Gotta wear them already, all the time. Just hit record and grab the good shit when it happens. A side front that forget about the camera and ride. No ducking, adjusting , wiping the lens, etc.....

Thanks for the backs and forth all...... Helped me make my mind up.
 
#16 ·
And don't forget, it's also waterproof down to 180'. Though mine's never been past 10'. I also have my iPhone in a Lifeproof housing, which is waterproof down to 7'. It's good for wet snow or rain days, and the occasional drop in a puddle. Or taking pictures snorkeling. Can't really make phone calls underwater (though they do make waterproof headphones for it).
 
#18 ·
I've run a binding mount, cool for one run but then you get sea sick from the slope angle changing drastically every couple seconds.

I've run head mounts and they're cool but you don't really admire the view or the run, it looks nothing like what it actually looks like to the riders eyes. Looks much slower and less steep... :dunno:

The best videos I've seen for showing yourself do seem to be the pole mounts, although I too wouldn't want to carry one around all the time. The helmet works decent for following somebody but if I get a camera again I'll change the lens to a narrow angle instead of the wide shit fishbowl look.

I honestly got pretty bored of the "action cam" concept. It was fun for a bit but the footage isn't that useful. I've got a couple videos now that are fun to watch every once in a while I guess.

I'm going to be riding in a few weeks with a group that will have proper cameras out for video and stills, can't wait to see the results! :yahoo:
 
#20 ·
Enjoy the ride with the good cams..... Sounds like fun. Honestly when I really think about that's the only time a cam would be super fun. When you just get it or when it's a situation like yours coming up.

Otherwise it would just kind of get boring. I could see having hours of vids I'd never watch. Fuck I've got thousands and thousands of pics I've looked at one time and will most likely never look at again. Thousands........
 
#22 ·
There are several different lens settings. The fisheye is just the default. The widescreen HD looks much better. I agree, the default fisheye makes everything looks less steep. I only use mine when I'm hitting a new location or for underwater or when I just want to be able to mount the cam someplace and operate via remote.
 
#23 ·
I just got the GoPro Black for Christmas, and am eyeing this helmet front mount. I actually just got a new helmet this year since the one I used the 2 seasons previously was all scratched up from tree branches. It was a matte white Bern Watts, but turned more of a brown tiger camo after just a handful of days lol.

I'm thinking this front mount might be less obtrusive and less likely to get caught/damaged/knocked off, not to mention eliminate that periscope/peacock look. Anybody tried it before?

Helmet Front Mount - GoPro Official Store: Wearable Digital Cameras for Sports
 
#26 ·
I'm thinking this front mount might be less obtrusive and less likely to get caught/damaged/knocked off, not to mention eliminate that periscope/peacock look. Anybody tried it before?
You won't be able to put your goggles up. That might not matter much to you, but just pointing it out.

Edit: crap, looks like I'm a me-too.
 
#24 · (Edited)
It looks like it hangs a bit low. Also looks like no place to put your goggles. On the flip side it looks like the best helmet mount I've seen.

Edit -- I thought that helmet came as a whole, now I see it's just a mount for any helmet.

I really want to like this thing because well, I'm just a digital toy whore.
 
#29 ·
Sure the Contour has a less awkward shape, has GPS, and best of all is from a local co. and I could've gotten any of their models for super cheap. However I've demoed it and GoPro is better at what matters--picture/sound quality. The GoPro has always been a bit better when comparing previous models head to head and the Hero3 Black edition continues that domination. It's not even worth arguing. If anything, as an alternative to the GoPro, the new models from JVC & Sony are definitely worth checking out.
 
#32 · (Edited)
Not so far. But I will make a leash that attaches directly to the helmet. Not to the mount. I was riding pow so crashes where uneventful. Or switch e to the goggle mount or top vent mount...
 
#36 ·
The front helmet mount isn't ideal if you have a brim. You'll need to set the mount back a little to clear it and that might mean the mount integration isnt as good as it would have been depending on the helmet shape.

It also might feel a little front heavy. But i didn't get to test it because I forget the Sd card on the one day I could have done :(
 
#37 ·
I know the GP haters won't get this, but the Contour is pretty much the same size as the GP2 (the GP3 is even smaller). Not the same dimensions, but the same size. Contour crammed their stuff into a tube shape. GP decided upon a rectangle, because they can then fit it with an LCD screen. I love the LCD screen. How does that work on the Contour? And does the Contour go down to 180' underwater? Just curious.
 
#44 ·
Same volume, sure. And a Ford Escape and a Aston Martin likely occupy the same volume of space too... :dunno:

What's the point of the LCD screen again? The contour has one switch. Slide on and it turns the camera on and starts recording, slide it back and it's off.

Remember the Contour Roam is waterproof WITHOUT the housing. It's only a small waterproof rating but I have used it for snorkelling, kayaking, and of course all weather snowboarding WITHOUT a case... Have you taken your Go Pro deeper than 10' down in the water?

In my mind, you're not "cool" if you give a shit about whether or not people think you look "cool."
There's form and function. Ideally you'd want the best of both worlds in one product. The GoPro CLEARLY is the underdog in the form category vs. all other helmet cam options I've seen. As you mentioned above function is similar. So what you're essentially saying is that you'd rather buy an ugly product that works the same? I'm not sure I get it.

I certainly put a lot of weight into the function side of my purchase decisions, but to suggest that it makes me somehow "not cool" to also consider form, I just don't understand. :question:
 
#39 · (Edited)
Nothing "bad" about them. What that picture doesn't show you is the big plastic housing you need to put it in if you want the same functionality of the GoPro. Keep in mind, the GoPro is actually pretty small. Very small. Like the size of a box of matches. You can use it outside the plastic housing just like a regular camera. A little, tiny regular camera. It isn't until you put it in the waterproof plastic housing that it gets "big." Same with the Contour. That picture is totally misleading...the Contour is shown WITHOUT the waterproof housing, while the GP is shown WITH the housing. Apples to apples, the Contour is just as "obtrusive" as the GP.

Here is a very positive review of the Contour. http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/contour-plus-2-review/ Read it objectively...what REALLY is the difference? The reviewer talks about how "cool" it looks. But you STILL have to blindly mess with buttons while the thing is strapped to your helmet. There is virtually no difference other than the shape. And the inferior specs. Access to the controls is very similar, resolutions are similar, prices are similar. So I guess it gets back to Torpedo's original post...it's all in how it looks. You're not "cool" if you have the Teletubby camera.

In my mind, you're not "cool" if you give a shit about whether or not people think you look "cool." Buy whatever works best for you, just as you'd do with your bindings, boots and boards. But just as you'd do with those pieces of equipment, check the specs. See how it fits your needs. Maybe the Contour is best, maybe the GoPro would offer more options. Maybe you could save $500 and just ride with someone who has already pissed away their money!

READ THE REVIEW at the link. Especially the last paragraph. The reviewer all but admits it's not as good as the GP, and it costs $100 more. Resolutions are more limited. It has clunky software. But hey...as long as it LOOKS cool!
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top