![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
|
So I am someone who is blessed with a massive head. I was looking at the Smith Vantage cause it has nice low profile. However, I don't care for the brim (even though it is a small one). On the Smith Optic webpage they mention "Low-Profile Regulator Adjustable Climate Control" as a feature for the Transport.
Any of you guys have info on how the 2 compare with each other as far as profile is concerned? Any other comparison info would be appreciated too. Thanks |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 30
|
I'm not a huge fan of the profile of the Transport. It's comfortable, the fit is good and I like the Boa adjustment but you can see that it's kind of domey on my head.
I bought a men's helmet so that's possibly a factor but I wouldn't exactly call it low profile. Maybe if someone has a pic of the Vantage you can compare how they sit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 418
|
Whatever Smith helmet you choose, be sure to try it on. I've found their sizing to be inconsistent between different models. I have a large head and the fit of the Holt and Variant work best for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 683
|
Can't go wrong with the Vantage, but you could go brimless Variant as well... both are pretty low profile. I usually wear a large in helmets, but dropped to a medium in the Vantage when I actually tried it on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 239
|
Quote:
Almost matches your pants
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|