![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
Not that it is used much in mountain action type shots, but the LARGE aperture can give you great DOF shots that I really enjoy. Ill admit however that they dont get used much in snowboarding. I wasn't saying Sigmas were horrible. I was specifically referring to the lens itself not the brand. The 70-200mm I just find too much. I'd rather something in a 24-105mm (be it a fixed 50mm or whatever). At the end of the day, a lens choice can be pretty personal. PHOTOGRAPHS (not "pictures") are very much a form of art, and while I prefer a some art, others may not. Eek, Fuzebox and I might all prefer different styles and therefore prefer using very different lens. I dont think you have gotten any bad advice here and have been given some great options to try out. Have fun and see what you like. (or post them here and we will judge) Gotta throw it out there again though. The 50mm 1.8 is a great buy for a lens that you can do a lot of fun with. I highly recommend that for any new photographer. Last edited by AdamBQ; 01-25-2012 at 12:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada, ON
Posts: 38
|
i'll quickly post my opinion. Typically when your riding pipe or even just out snowboarding its a sunny day. So canon 70-200 f/4 non IS. Cheapest, you don't need the 2.8 unless you shoot indoors really, it's just a nice thing to have. As for the IS, it'll be sunny/bright enough outside so your shutter speed will be fast enough and you wont get any shaky photos.
Budget: canon 70-200 f/4 non IS -$500-700 Got money: canon 70-200 f/4 IS or f/2.8 IS |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|