Prosecution for the mob? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-22-2009, 11:28 AM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Prosecution for the mob?

washingtonpost.com

washingtonpost.com

Now if they'd only grow a pair and actually go after this kind of shit everywhere.

Last edited by MunkySpunk; 04-22-2009 at 11:31 AM. Reason: Fixing the links to piss off the 'Right'
MunkySpunk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-23-2009, 09:50 AM
Veteran Member
 
Perpetual3am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is promising, but I'm not holding my breath until I see someone in the Bush admin. brought up on charges. Dick Cheney is probably sacrificing children to the devil as we speak to prevent this from happening.

"This comment brought to you by Bombay Gin"
Perpetual3am is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-23-2009, 12:07 PM
Senior Member
 
justdust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Albany
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
I think, as a nation, we are strong enough to withstand the prosecution when necessary -- under U.S. law -- of our own elected officials and political appointees for political decisions they made while in office...but I'm not ready to cede jurisdiction over such political decision making to any other country or collection of countries. To do so would, imo, seriously undermine national soveriegnty. As far as potential war crimes go, any country that signs on to any international law addressing war crimes for political leaders should first have similar domestic laws applicable to its own leaders and the stones to enforce them.
justdust is offline  
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-23-2009, 01:01 PM
Veteran Member
 
Mooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Your pants
Posts: 1,589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Nah Obama just cleverly opened the door to prosecution WHILE protecting the very people you want prosecuted. Cheny and Bush have nothing to fear. Their lawyers on the other hand may be in hot water.

Those "interrogation techniques" were sent before a team of legal heads to determine their legality. I can't find the article atm but basically a legally binding determination was made (by a court) that they did not fall under the realm of torture and were thus legal under various circumstances. Right or wrong, this absolves the administration of legal wrong doing. They did what they believed to be legal.

However, those who made the legal decision are very open to prosecution.

I have a word limit on my cynicism
Mooz is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-23-2009, 04:01 PM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The admin folks are safe, that's a sad fact. But it's far more important for the U.S. legal system to hold our own people accountable. I'd accept the Euros as a stopgap measure, but after some of the shit they've also turned a blind eye to, they're not in much of a position to be pointing fingers either.
MunkySpunk is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-24-2009, 07:38 AM
Senior Member
 
justdust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Albany
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Why does everybody pick on the lawyers?
justdust is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-24-2009, 08:22 AM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Because lawyers pick on everybody.
MunkySpunk is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-24-2009, 08:59 PM
Senior Member
 
justdust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Albany
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Lawyers don't pick on everybody...their clients do. Lawyers just level the playing field...if you have gobs of greenstuff!
justdust is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-24-2009, 11:14 PM
snaplok
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
It's the lawyers who bend that law which they want to break. Good reason why a lot of them become future politians.

What's funny about them being put on trail, is that if they serve their clients, shouldn't their clients also, if not more so, be put on trial? That would be the Bush, Cheney, and Rice clan. Since that will happen the day after the sun destroys the earth, it's hypocritical to go after the middle men. I think people remember Nixon was found guilty on all charges and resigned. But before he could become a crook, he was pardoned.

The Bush fiasco of the last 8 years will probably take 16 years to fix. That goes for all the problems from allowing guns in national parks to denying global warming exists. If anyone should be held by the indepedant investigators as responsible for the global problems including allowing torture under the Patriot Act or Homeland Security, it should be the chimp that ran this country into the ground.


Last edited by snaplok; 04-24-2009 at 11:21 PM.
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old 04-25-2009, 08:58 AM
Veteran Member
 
Mooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Your pants
Posts: 1,589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by snaplok View Post
What's funny about them being put on trail, is that if they serve their clients, shouldn't their clients also, if not more so, be put on trial?
Not if the clients believed they were acting within the law and had no reason to believe otherwise. And I think you all are expecting a bit much from the "prosecution" of the bush admin lawyers. The most they have to worry about is being disbarred.

You should be more concerned about how our lawmakers knew about the whole thing including waterboarding and only now pretend they were against it because public opinion says they should be.

Pelosi: I didn't know it was going on
News: Um, yes you did
Pelosi: No no, they told me but it was secret and we weren't allowed to talk about it so that means I didn't know.
News: Wat?

I have a word limit on my cynicism
Mooz is offline  
 

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome