So now youtube is somehow biased?
Who said they were biased? Is this where you argue against points I don't make because you missed the boat again?
Youtube is totally unedited, unverified, and open access. Anyone, I mean anyone can put whatever they want on it. It doesn't make it qualified at all.
John Coleman (founder of The Weather Channel) is somehow less important because this TV clip was posted on youtube?
Do you get an honorary degree when you upload to youtube? Does it somehow make you smarter to hit the 'upload' button?
John Coleman is as important as he was before posting this, just as irrelevant to meteorological research and just as untrained in science. And he's got as much authority and actual research training in meteorology as a garbage man.
He's got a degree in journalism. He's a weather newscaster. This means he's good at getting in front of the camera and bullshitting for 5 minutes twice an evening. That and a buck will get him a cup of coffee during a NASA tour. He's not
a meteorologist. He's got no
formal scientific training or qualifications.
Do you have any studies supporting global warming that have been produced by organizations that did not have anything to gain politically or financially?
Oh how little
you know about the peer review process, tenure, and granting agencies. Probably about as much as John Coleman.
It is interesting that all of the proposals that have resulted from the global warming scare result in huge shifts in either money or power.
Yes, because NOAA is secretly trying to take over the world. It's all a smoke screen to keep us from asking Obama about his birth certificate! You finally broke the case!
I would have thought that we would have an immediate call for the construction of nuclear power plants in the U.S., but that is not the case.
So that's your answer to climate change? Throw up some nuclear power plants, and.... done.
Actually it is the case. It's one proposal of a multi-pronged approach.
Instead, we have schemes which involve things like "carbon credits"
You expect the corporations to curb their own emissions?
It's another part of a multi-pronged approach. Quite being so narrow minded. It's going to take a lot more than throwing up some nuclear plants, including FORCING the corps to reduce emissions.
Congratulations, you finally did it!! You get a gold star.
1 scientist against climate change theory before congress. Did you notice the parade of scientists that disagreed with him also before congress. Anything else?