For chrissake. Just laugh at idiots for being idiots instead of getting all butt sore that it was a Republitard being stupid this time. Google 'interviews clueless Obama supporter' and post the Howard Stern (as respected and professional a journalist as he is) link instead of getting your panties in a knot. Better yet, make it equivalent and get yourself a link from an actual news source picking a random Obama supporter out of a crowd at his book signing - as was done with the original link I gave. We can all have a good laugh and you guys won't even soil your tampons.
But I suppose we can turn this into another humorless political debate. Why not? We don't do that enough around here.
Im sure if you went to a barrack obama book signing you would find the same thing along with credible analytical people of course.
I don't argue, but ask yourself what the ratio of analytical people to blithering idiots would be at their respective book signing?
The bottom line is Sarah palin represents the exact same thing Barrack Obama represents....Popularity!
EDIT: Uhh... yeah, that's how you go about getting elected last I checked. They're politicians, it's their job to be popular enough get to elected. So sue them.
If they represented the same thing, they'd be in the same party.
Obama at least represents some measure of intelligence, a pleasant change from the last prez, and a rescue from Palinism among all the other things you maintain. He's not perfect, and he's not doing as well as he'd promised (name one politician that has), but it could be worse, he COULD be Palin. Or Bush. Or McSame.
Palin represents intolerance, imperialism, unconstitutionally merging religious beliefs with politics, setting the country back 50 years, and mocking that which she doesn't understand (which is quite a bit).
They have to be enjoying life right now that they are out of the political spotlight.
Yeah.. out of the spotlight. Is that what you call it when you've heard about her and/or her family every two weeks for the last 15 months?