Score one more for the rich!! - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2010, 12:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brimstone View Post
Why do you left wingers always go back to Bush. He is irrelevant now. I was the first one yelling about the Patriot Act. Bush did some very bad things and the Patriot Act was probably the worst. Bringing up the fact that Bush would let protesters say anything they want, but made them stand in a separate area to avoid having every speech become a shouting match seems somewhat trivial.
Sorry if pointing out the negatives and using actual examples to demonstrate conservative hypocrisy is inconvenient. As much as you'd like to forget, and as much as you'd like us to forget in these debates... It still happened, and we're still suffering from the decisions the decisioner made.
__________________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

10/11 - 24, Smote on Feb 13
MunkySpunk is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 12:04 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 153
Default

How are my comments different than yours? I have openly criticized Bush for the Patriot Act and for poorly handling Iraq/Afghanistan. I believe I have also stated on here that I would have voted for Hillary over McCain because he was/is more liberal on many policies than she was/is.

Obama has pushed for the highly publicized fairness doctrine which would regulate only certain peoples speech. He is now, along with other Democrats, saying that he will do what he can to reverse the effect of this SCOTUS decision. Any attempt to limit the ability of any individual or group to get their message to the American people is an attack on the first amendment. Freedom of speech should not only be a right when the government likes the message.
Brimstone is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 12:06 PM   #13 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Default

Spoken like a true right wing corporate schill.
__________________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

10/11 - 24, Smote on Feb 13
MunkySpunk is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 03:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 153
Default

I would take Bill Clinton back in a heartbeat right now. He had the sense to move back to the center after the Republicans took over congress.

The Fairness Doctrine was just bad policy and needed to be removed. The Fairness Doctrine was abolished by the FCC under Reagan in 1987. The Fairness Doctrine singled out a certain type of media and programming for "fairness". The reason that companies like Clear Channel put these shows on the air is that they are popular and get high ratings. They have an entertainment value that is profitable. People have had the option of listening to opposite minded programming, but they have not been able to stay in business.

Air America Radio Closing, Filing for Bankruptcy - ABC News

The regulations would have nothing to do with television. Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow would be able to spout their idiotic comments nightly and it would be fine. I doubt anyone would require MSNBC to air Hannity or Beck as "equal time".

Obama is not looking to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine directly, but rather to change regulations through Cass Sunstein

At what point do you think it is inappropriate for the government to regulate speech? What becomes fair? Who decides who gets "equal time"? Do we need programming for Anarchists, Libertarians, Republicans, Democrats, Socialists, Communists, etc.?
Brimstone is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 06:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 1,922
Default

You're not understanding what this is actually about. The majority of the media in the country is owned by what, 3 companies? News Corp (fox news) owns something like 80% of the media in the ENTIRE WORLD! Controlling information like that destroys a democracy. That's why the SCOTUS smack down is distressing.
snowjeeper is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums