Even if Vic Rawl ran a poor campaign, I find it hard to believe that someone who didn't run ANY kind of campaign could get the majority just with his name above the other on the ballot. I'm not talking no commercials, I mean no signs, website, public gatherings. He was kicked out of the army, lives with his parents, is facing porn charges. The list goes on and on. Interesting article, but I think it's a crock. If the guy really was getting checks directed to a soul singer, then there's bank fraud right there. With that last comment in mind from Micheal Sigman, I discredit the entire article, even Faux News (who just got a woman fired in the agricultural division by editing clips of her speech and the idiots that watched it) wouldn't go that far.
Obviously he had to pay the 10,000+ to get on the ballot, the problem is he is unemployed! He had to get that money from somewhere or someone. The guys PR
people are flat out refusing almost all interviews, clearly they are afraid of a reporter asking a question about finances, where he got the money, etc. When he is asked questions it comes back "no comment". I'm not ruling out a plant, it sounds way too similar to the Rod Shealy thing. He got 60% of the vote.....are South Carolinian's really that stupid?