CalvaryCougar, I'm going to set you a challenge. More on that in a sec..
One thing I've noticed is that you've responded quite selectively and steered well away from the more challenging points. Focusing the opinions of others and bible quotes as support. There have been lots of points to respond to so I'm not judging your reasons for this, I understand if you prefer to discus the ones you are more familiar with.
In particular I'm interested to know what your thought on the ageing the earth by means of dendrology are. And furthermore the complete absence of evidence for a global flood (specifically in the tree clock) within the last 11,000 years.
Here's the challenge: Are you able to respond to without quoting or referencing the bible?
I have also taken a fair bit of time to review the material you have posted and I have to say I find no evidence or merit in any of it. I am interested to know - and its a simple question not related to any particular item you sent - what criteria you personally need for this type of information to pass before you accept it personally?
So that's 2 questions. It's obviously up to you if you answer. Neither is meant as an attack, like I said I'm genuinely quite interested in some of the psychology of belief systems and i'm interested in your answers here.
Last edited by Slush Puppie; 10-08-2012 at 06:52 PM.