![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#351 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: PAC NW
Posts: 636
|
Quote:
more education and restrictions should be put into place for sure. what if Red Dawn happens and no one has guns any more? we're fucked, that's what happens.. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#354 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
Sorry if it came across as a defense or if it wasn't clear. I'm a damn engineer...i'm not good at this essay type writing/defending position stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
#355 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Front range, CO
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Front range, CO
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
|
This goes back to what I'm saying. It's the justification for advocates of not changing. This thing was written in the 1700's? Since then, the world has changed... Slavery, prohibition, these things were met with strong opposition from many camps when there was talk of getting rid of them. Adapting is part growing as country, falling behind and becoming 3rd world...
|
|
|
|
|
#358 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Front range, CO
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#359 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,066
|
That's a bit of a slippery slope though, don't you think? At what point does does someone need a bigger, and better gun to protect themselves? It's kind of like fighting fire with fire, at what point do you have an inferno going?
|
|
|
|
|
#360 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
However, if you have a gun in the house and faced with this scenario, as rare as it may be for the majority of people, I wonder if it would even help? Again, I should stress this is not right or wrong, just food for thought: a) a responsible gun owner would have their gun locked up, which would make retrieval during a hostile home invasion almost impossible in said circumstance. b) assuming you didn't lock the gun up (scary as that seems, but that's a whole other topic), do you think most humane people could actually look another person in the face and pull the trigger? Even in defense, don't undermine how difficult this is. Furthermore, does you having a gun now turn what may have been a robbery turn it into a shoot out, Wild West style? Remember, most home invaders want the loot and are not there to commit a senseless murder, but if they are facing someone armed, they will probably not hesitate as much as the other guy. Again, not true in all cases of course, but something to think about. I hate to sound like an ass, but if you live in a rough neighborhood, do what you can to get out of there, move, give yourself a better chance of avoiding sad situations. Something North Americans have been trying to do for many years. It'll give you a better chance than an arms race in the community. With or without guns, you cannot eliminate risk, only try and manage it the best way we feel we can. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|