Gun Control Debate thread - Page 39 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2012, 12:33 PM   #381 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cc898 View Post
Please tell me you did not just refer to a Semi-auto as a machine gun. I hope the mg part of that was refering to something else.

I agree with the health care part, it needs to be factored in.

As for why the mom NEEDS it, well, she was obviously cleared to own it when she bought it legally. Until it becomes illegal to buy something, who is to declare who needs what? I really like beer, I am legal to buy it, but I don't really NEED it. Well, some days I do.

The whole thing needs to be in the responsibity of ownership, no matter what we are talking about, cars boats planes, beer, guns.
No, it can't be only the owner responsibility. From the moment you enable someone to get something that can harm others you are responsible as well.
Especially when the "owner" or user, is mentally sick.

There need to be a logic between what you WANT and what you can GET. I want a stinger Missile, few land-mines and a chain gun. Should I be able to get them? You can get all the beer you want... If instead you want 5 boxes of C-4 I get suspicious. It depends on the product you want...and how dangerous for the rest of us is. Do you really need me telling you?
__________________
2012/13 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-19-2012, 12:44 PM   #382 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 139
Default

Do you really want a system that looks over your shoulder and decides for you what you can and can't have?

Yes I agree, certain things need restriction. Who are you going to hold responsible for the actions of someone intent to do harm? If not the person themselves? Where would that end? I know its been said, but, a drunk driver kills someone. Do we hold the people that built the car responsible, or Jim Beam? or maybe the guy that drank too much and got in the car.

There are many things out there that do harm and yet are legal, so yeah its the responsibilty of the owner. Cigarettes are still legal and they KILL tons of people and cause all kinds of problems. What do they do about that? They try and educate people. Same with drugs....they kill, they are illegal....we educate.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:45 PM   #383 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 139
Default

I am pretty sure you can't afford a stinger! But if you could, you could in theory get your hands on one......happens all the time.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:01 PM   #384 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,212
Default

Not my shoulder...just over the shoulder of the NRA Right wing gun maniac...and his/her family more or less mentally ill.. Or should I just trust you with your guns because...you tell me to?
Not only I want more control, but I want the NRA to pay for it, pay for damages, court, and cures for the mentally ill responsible of those crimes..NRA members can share the cost since they care so much about guns Why do I have to pay for the safety of YOUR toys?





Quote:
Originally Posted by cc898 View Post
Do you really want a system that looks over your shoulder and decides for you what you can and can't have?
__________________
2012/13 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06

Last edited by KIRKRIDER; 12-19-2012 at 01:05 PM.
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:10 PM   #385 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 139
Default

You can't have it just over their shoulder, its going to be everyones shoulder.

I am not a right wing gun nut, and I am not addicted to bullets, and I do take trips and I do see the world, and I also read a lot. I went to college, I own a business, and I have three kids. Does that make me normal in your eyes?

And yeah, you have to trust me with my guns, as of right now you dont have a choice in the matter. I have had guns since I was 18 and legal to buy them, I have yet to kill anyone, and have not broken any laws what so ever in my ownership, nor do I plan to do so.

Okay....sorry. You do have a choice in the matter, you don't have to trust me. My bad.

Last edited by cc898; 12-19-2012 at 01:16 PM.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:12 PM   #386 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 139
Default

You give the NRA way too much credit, and no, I am not a member.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:21 PM   #387 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cc898 View Post
You give the NRA way too much credit, and no, I am not a member.
Don't take it personally then. Normal is subjective... My point is that in a nation insanely obsessed with war and weapons there needs to be more control. You are not responsible world citizens!

But I repeat. Why do I have to pay for the safety of your toys? What makes you think you need a weapon? What happened in your life that made you feel so unsafe that you have to have one? I'm 47 and I never needed one.
__________________
2012/13 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:32 PM   #388 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 139
Default

I don't take any of it personally. I am simply voicing my opinion on the matter.

Its a bit of a blanket statement to say we are not responsible world citizens don't ya think?

I do not own them because I feel unsafe, as I said earlier, I am not a gun NUT, I enjoy shooting, I find it to be a fun challenge, its one of those hobbies in life that you can keep improving. Its my privilege to have them, I did not say its a right. I am allowed because I am a law abiding citizen, same as being able to drive a car.

I will not disagree with you, if it can be done right, there should be a system in place to help reduce incidences like what has happened recently. But I feel that you cannot include all gun owners as a problem, the problem ones are HUGE minority right now.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:53 PM   #389 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,212
Default

Yes I felt bad after writing that.

But a nation that has a war (or more) per generation, and countless tragedies like this one does have a problem with guns. After living here for 14 years I see what causes the problem better than before, but i still don't see the will for a real solution. Until today maybe...I want to see what really happens.

I don't have a problem with you in particular owning a gun, I assume you are a responsible person until proven otherwise, but I don't see the logic where you need a permit and regular checks to own a car, but not for owning a gun?

Your example is not honest. A car is not designed to kill people. A gun is. The intended use for a car is to transport you to the...slopes... the intended use for a gun is to terminate a person. Where's the similarity?

The problem seem to be, that some people here feel the need to have an arsenal at home, and with kids around that is asking for an accident to happen.
So...why do people think they need an arsenal? Brainwashed into thinking that?





Quote:
Originally Posted by cc898 View Post
I don't take any of it personally. I am simply voicing my opinion on the matter.

Its a bit of a blanket statement to say we are not responsible world citizens don't ya think?

I do not own them because I feel unsafe, as I said earlier, I am not a gun NUT, I enjoy shooting, I find it to be a fun challenge, its one of those hobbies in life that you can keep improving. Its my privilege to have them, I did not say its a right. I am allowed because I am a law abiding citizen, same as being able to drive a car.

I will not disagree with you, if it can be done right, there should be a system in place to help reduce incidences like what has happened recently. But I feel that you cannot include all gun owners as a problem, the problem ones are HUGE minority right now.
__________________
2012/13 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 04:57 PM   #390 (permalink)
Drunk with power...er beer.
 
Donutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,671
Blog Entries: 176
Default

Heroic dying teacher saved students

On the one hand, people who don't have guns WILL use other weapons. On the other hand, other weapons are demonstratably less effective.
__________________

Illegitimi non carborundum


Mountain Days: 30
Donutz is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums